Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;162(3):669-73.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09521.x. Epub 2009 Oct 26.

Modification of the cutaneous dermatomyositis disease area and severity index, an outcome instrument

Affiliations

Modification of the cutaneous dermatomyositis disease area and severity index, an outcome instrument

M Yassaee et al. Br J Dermatol. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Validated outcome measures in dermatology help standardize and improve patient care. A scoring system of skin disease severity in dermatomyositis known as the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) has been developed.

Objectives: To simplify and improve the tool for clinical research and care, we modified the CDASI and validated the new version, v2.

Methods: The original CDASI has four activity and two damage measures. The modified CDASI has three activity and two damage measures. The skin disease of 20 patients with dermatomyositis was evaluated by the same dermatologist using both the original and the modified CDASI. Global validation measures were implemented to assess overall skin disease state, skin disease activity and skin damage. Spearman's rho (r(sp)), adjusted for multiple observations on subjects, was used to determine the relationship between the two versions of the CDASI and their correlation with the physician global measures (PGMs).

Results: The total score and activity and damage subscores of the original and the modified CDASI correlated perfectly with each other (r(sp) = 0.99, 1.00, 1.00). The PGM-overall skin scale correlated with the total scores (r(sp) = 0.72, r(sp) = 0.76) and activity subscores (r(sp) = 0.68, r(sp) = 0.63) but not with the damage subscores (r(sp) = 0.14, r(sp) = 0.15) of the original and the modified CDASI, respectively. However, the PGM-activity and PGM-damage scales correlated with the activity (r(sp) = 0.76, r(sp) = 0.75) and damage subscores (r(sp) = 0.90, r(sp) = 0.90), respectively, of the original and the modified CDASI.

Conclusions: The modified CDASI is perfectly correlated with the original CDASI. It has equally good concurrent validity with the PGM-overall skin and PGM-activity scales. The CDASI subscores have equally good concurrent validity with the PGM-activity and PGM-damage scales. We suggest that PGMs of skin disease activity and damage should be assessed separately for greater specificity. The modified CDASI is a refined and equally as useful outcome measure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
(a) Original Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI): changes were made to circled elements. (b) Modified CDASI, v2.
Fig 1
Fig 1
(a) Original Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI): changes were made to circled elements. (b) Modified CDASI, v2.

References

    1. Bhor U, Pande S. Scoring systems in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2006;72:315–21. - PubMed
    1. Klein RQ, Bangert CA, Costner M, et al. Comparison of the reliability and validity of outcome instruments for cutaneous dermatomyositis. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:887–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albrecht J, Taylor L, Berlin JA, et al. The CLASI (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index): an outcome instrument for cutaneous lupus erythematosus. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;125:889–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gaines E, Werth VP. Development of outcome measures for autoimmune dermatoses. Arch Dermatol Res. 2008;300:3–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singer AJ, Thode HC, Hollander JE. Research fundamentals: selection and development of clinical outcome measures. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:397–401. - PubMed

Publication types