Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Nov:10 Suppl 1:11-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF03262694.

Histological validation of a laser fluorescence device for occlusal caries detection in primary molars

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Histological validation of a laser fluorescence device for occlusal caries detection in primary molars

D Apostolopoulou et al. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Aim: This was to validate in vitro a laser fluorescence device, DIAGNOdent 2095 - DD, on the detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological examination as the gold standard and to compare the laser fluorescence findings to the results of the conventionally used diagnostic methods.

Study design and methods: 111 occlusal pits in 24 extracted primary molars were examined for caries by one trained operator (Intra-examiner Reliability K>0.83), using direct visual (DV), indirect visual (IDV), radiographic (XR) and fluorescence (DD) examinations and then the extent of caries was determined histologically. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and the area under the ROC curve - AUC were calculated for all methods, using the histological evaluation as the gold standard.

Statistics: Differences between examination methods were estimated by pair-wise comparison of their respective AUC.

Results: DD's sensitivity for enamel and for dentine lesions respectively was 0.90 and 0.36, its specificity 0.36 and 0.91 and its accuracy 0.61 and 0.65. The DD device exhibited better sensitivity than specificity for enamel lesions and better specificity than sensitivity for lesions into dentine. The DD device was found to have the highest sensitivity for lesions into enamel, specificity and accuracy and as well as the largest AUC compared with all other methods. For lesions into dentine however, according to AUC values the DD was not statistically significant different from the other methods.

Conclusion: Compared with the other methods, the DD had the highest validity for enamel caries while its validity for caries into dentine was not statistical different from the other methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Caries Res. 2003 Nov-Dec;37(6):437-41 - PubMed
    1. Swed Dent J. 1982;6(1):1-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Dent. 2006 Feb;19(1):19-22 - PubMed
    1. J Dent. 2002 May;30(4):129-34 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2006 Summer;30(4):287-91 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources