Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Jan 15;144(2):161-8.

Screening for hypercholesterolemia among Canadians: how much will it cost?

Affiliations

Screening for hypercholesterolemia among Canadians: how much will it cost?

S A Grover et al. CMAJ. .

Erratum in

  • Can Med Assoc J 1991 Mar 1;144(5):545

Abstract

Objective: To determine the cost of screening all Canadians aged 30 years or more without coronary heart disease (CHD) for hypercholesterolemia.

Data sources: The expected results of initial screening of the serum cholesterol level were estimated on the basis of 1986 Canadian census data and the 1978 Canada Health Survey. The results of repeat testing were estimated on the basis of data from the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study. Lipid profile results were extrapolated from tests at the Montreal General Hospital's clinical chemistry laboratory. Laboratory costs and primary care practitioner costs were provided by the Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists and provincial fee schedules respectively.

Main results: Among 12,479,356 Canadians free of CHD 48.7% would be identified as being at high risk, 4.8% would be identified as being at moderate risk, and 46.6% would be reassured that their lipid risk for CHD was low. The total cost of implementing the program in the first year would be $432 million to $561 million ($325 million for laboratory tests and $107 million to $236 million for visits to primary care practitioners).

Conclusion: The substantial cost of implementing a nationwide screening program must be weighed against the expected benefits to ensure that the final result is both practical and economically feasible.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Dec;116(6):878-85 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1987 Nov 12;317(20):1237-45 - PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Public Health. 1985;6:41-63 - PubMed
    1. Public Health Rep. 1989 Sep-Oct;104(5):425-32 - PubMed
    1. CMAJ. 1989 Oct 15;141(8):797 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources