Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Nov;32 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S253-9.
doi: 10.2337/dc09-S318.

Insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes

Affiliations
Review

Insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes

Sanne G Swinnen et al. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationships between mean end point daily insulin dose (A) and the frequency of patient contact (clinical visits and telephone contacts combined) (B) and mean reduction in A1C, and between mean end point daily insulin dose and mean weight gain (C), during nine randomized trials investigating insulin initiation with NPH insulin, insulin detemir, or insulin glargine. Included studies are Bretzel et al. (34), Fritsche et al. (35), Hermansen et al. (28), Holman et al. (32), Philis-Tsimikas et al. (33), Riddle et al. (27), Rosenstock et al. (29), Yki-Järvinen et al. (36), and Yki-Järvinen et al. (37) (A and C). B does not include Holman, since this publication did not specify the number of interim telephone contacts. Two trials (28,35) did not report mean end point daily insulin dose as units per kilogram per day. We calculated the desired figures from the mean end point dose reported as units per day and mean body weight at study end. Three studies (Riddle and the two studies of Yki-Järvinen [27,36,37]) did not report reduction in A1C. We calculated these values from mean baseline and end point A1C levels.

References

    1. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837– 853 - PubMed
    1. Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, Miyata T, Isami S, Motoyoshi S, Kojima Y, Furuyoshi N, Shichiri M: Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995; 28: 103– 117 - PubMed
    1. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA: 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1577– 1589 - PubMed
    1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR: Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000; 321: 405– 412 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, Ferrannini E, Holman RR, Sherwin R, Zinman B: Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 193– 203 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms