Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;32(11):2094-8.
doi: 10.2337/dc09-0745.

Prediction of coronary heart disease risk in a general, pre-diabetic, and diabetic population during 10 years of follow-up: accuracy of the Framingham, SCORE, and UKPDS risk functions: The Hoorn Study

Affiliations

Prediction of coronary heart disease risk in a general, pre-diabetic, and diabetic population during 10 years of follow-up: accuracy of the Framingham, SCORE, and UKPDS risk functions: The Hoorn Study

Amber A W A van der Heijden et al. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To test the validity of the Framingham, Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), and UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk function in the prediction of risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in populations with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), intermediate hyperglycemia, and type 2 diabetes.

Research design and methods: Calibration and discrimination of the three prediction models were tested using prospective data for 1,482 Caucasian men and women, 50-75 years of age, who participated in the Hoorn Study. All analyses were stratified by glucose status.

Results: During 10 years of follow-up, a total of 197 CHD events, of which 43 were fatal, were observed in this population, with the highest percentage of first CHD events in the diabetic group. The Framingham and UKPDS prediction models overestimated the risk of first CHD event in all glucose tolerance groups. Overall, the prediction models had a low to moderate discriminatory capacity. The SCORE risk function was the best predictor of fatal CHD events in the group with NGT (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.79 [95% CI 0.70-0.87]), whereas the UKPDS performed better in the intermediate hyperglycemia group (0.84 [0.74-0.94]) in the estimation of fatal CHD risk. After exclusion of known diabetic patients, all prediction models had a higher discriminatory ability in the group with diabetes.

Conclusions: The use of the Framingham function for prediction of the first CHD event is likely to overestimate an individual's absolute CHD risk. In CHD prevention, application of the SCORE and UKPDS functions might be useful in the absence of a more valid tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Observed and predicted incidence of first CHD events (A–C) and fatal CHD events (D–F) in quintiles of predicted risk estimated by the Framingham (□), SCORE (○), and UKPDS (▲) risk function according to glucose status group. IH, intermediate hyperglycemia; DM, type 2 diabetes.

References

    1. World Health Organization. World Health Report 2003: Shaping the Future Geneva, World Health Organization, 2003
    1. Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O: Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:580–591 - PubMed
    1. Lipscomb ER, Finch EA, Brizendine E, Saha CK, Hays LM, Ackermann RT: Reduced 10-year risk of CHD in patients who participated in community-based DPP: the DEPLOY pilot study. Diabetes Care 2008;32:394–396 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson KM, Wilson PW, Odell PM, Kannel WB: An updated coronary risk profile: a statement for health professionals. Circulation 1991;83:356–362 - PubMed
    1. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB: Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998;97:1837–1847 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms