Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009;36(5):375-86.

The comparative efficacy of percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization in 2009: a review

Affiliations
Review

The comparative efficacy of percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization in 2009: a review

Stephen A May et al. Tex Heart Inst J. 2009.

Abstract

Medical, percutaneous, and surgical therapies for coronary atherosclerotic disease are developing rapidly, with many recent breakthroughs in metabolic control, improvements in catheter and stent engineering, and advances in surgical technique. Treatment guidelines are still in their infancy and do not take into account several of these recent innovations. Consequently, determining the most appropriate treatment for many patients remains challenging. In this review, we examine the most recent revascularization guidelines, discuss important new data and trials comparing contemporary stent technology and coronary artery bypass surgery, and conclude with updated revascularization recommendations.

Keywords: Coronary artery bypass/methods/mortality; coronary artery disease/therapy; coronary stenosis/therapy; drug-eluting stents; myocardial revascularization/methods/trends; percutaneous coronary intervention; retreatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Fig. 1 Our revascularization algorithm. CAB = coronary artery bypass surgery; CAD = coronary artery disease; DES = drug-eluting stent; LM = left main; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; PCI = percutaneous intervention; pLAD = proximal left anterior descending coronary artery; TMT = treadmill test

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee [published erratum appears in Circulation 2009;119(3):e182]. Circulation 2009;119(3):480–6. - PubMed
    1. Ford ES, Ajani UA, Croft JB, Critchley JA, Labarthe DR, Kottke TE, et al. Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980–2000. N Engl J Med 2007;356(23): 2388–98. - PubMed
    1. Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S, Kastrati A, Morice MC, Schomig A, et al. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet 2007;370(9591):937–48. - PubMed
    1. Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG, Schofer J, Dawkins KD, Morice MC, et al. Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med 2007;356(10): 998–1008. - PubMed
    1. Barner HB. Operative treatment of coronary atherosclerosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85(4):1473–82. - PubMed

MeSH terms