Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;29(2):143-50.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1297-6. Epub 2009 Oct 30.

The Safe Functional Motion test is reliable for assessment of functional movements in individuals at risk for osteoporotic fracture

Affiliations

The Safe Functional Motion test is reliable for assessment of functional movements in individuals at risk for osteoporotic fracture

Norma J MacIntyre et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

The Safe Functional Motion (SFM) test is a performance-based tool developed to assess functional movements in individuals at risk for osteoporotic fracture. The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the scores on the short form of the SFM test (SFM-SF). A secondary objective was to evaluate the construct convergent validity of the balance domain. Community-dwelling adults with low bone mass (n = 36) completed the SFM-SF on two occasions. During one visit, SFM-SF performance was scored by two testers and additional tests of balance (Timed Up and Go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BERG), and Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBMS)) were completed. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the SFM-SF score is excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient >or= 0.90), and the balance domain score demonstrates acceptable associations with established clinical measures of balance (Spearman's rho = -0.69, 0.76, and 0.83 for TUG, BERG, and CBMS, respectively). SFM-SF provides reliable measures of functional movements in community-dwelling individuals at risk for osteoporotic fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2007 Feb;58(1):27-36 - PubMed
    1. Clin Rehabil. 2006 Oct;20(10):885-95 - PubMed
    1. Phys Ther. 2002 Feb;82(2):128-37 - PubMed
    1. J Biomech. 1982;15(9):669-75 - PubMed
    1. Phys Ther. 2005 Apr;85(4):323-35 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources