Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;38(1):33-40.
doi: 10.1007/s10439-009-9827-6. Epub 2009 Oct 30.

Geometry of the intervertebral volume and vertebral endplates of the human spine

Affiliations

Geometry of the intervertebral volume and vertebral endplates of the human spine

E B van der Houwen et al. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Replacement of a degenerated vertebral disc with an artificial intervertebral disc (AID) is currently possible, but poses problems, mainly in the force distribution through the vertebral column. Data on the intervertebral disc space geometry will provide a better fit of the prosthesis to the vertebrae, but current literature on vertebral disc geometry is very scarce or not suitable. In this study, existing CT-scans of 77 patients were analyzed to measure the intervertebral disc and vertebral endplate geometry of the lumbar spine. Ten adjacent points on both sides of the vertebrae (S1-superior to T12-inferior) and sagittal and transverse diameters were measured to describe the shape of the caudal and cranial vertebral planes of the vertebrae. It was found that the largest endplate depth is located in the middle or posterior regions of the vertebra, that there is a linear relationship between all inferior endplate depths and the endplate location (p < 0.0001) within the spinal column, and that the superior endplate depth increases with age by about 0.01 mm per year (p < 0.02). The wedge angle increases from T12-L1 to L5-S1. The results allow for improvement of the fit of intervertebral disc-prostheses to the vertebrae and optimized force transmission through the vertebral column.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Nomenclature and planes of orientation
Figure 2
Figure 2
Depth profiles (exact depth per point printed on the x-axis for clarity), endplate sizes and disc contour from the sagittal and frontal plane (all values in mm). Standard deviations depicted by error bars
Figure 3
Figure 3
Wedge angle in supine position; comparison against literature, standard deviations depicted by error bars
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bland–Altman plot: the difference in measurements against the average for the vernier caliper and maximum-gradient CT method (N = 12)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of endplate depth (mm) against literature,,, standard deviations depicted by error bars

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aharinejad S, et al. Morphometric analysis of vertebrae and intervertebral discs as a basis of disc replacement. Am. J. Anat. 1990;189:69–76. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001890109. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eijkelkamp, M. F. On the Development of an Artificial Intervertebral Disc. PhD-thesis, University of Groningen, 2002.
    1. Hall LT, et al. Morphology of the lumbar vertebral endplates. Spine. 1998;23(14):1517–1522. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199807150-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee, C. K. Intervertebral Disk and Nucleus Prosthesis. Patent US2008046082, 2003.
    1. Nissan M, et al. Dimensions of the human lumbar vertebrae in the sagittal plane. J. Biomech. 1986;19(9):743–758. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(86)90198-3. - DOI - PubMed