Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Dec;276(24):7217-27.
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07401.x.

Viral entry mechanisms: the increasing diversity of paramyxovirus entry

Affiliations
Review

Viral entry mechanisms: the increasing diversity of paramyxovirus entry

Everett C Smith et al. FEBS J. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

The paramyxovirus family contains established human pathogens such as the measles virus and human respiratory syncytial virus, as well as emerging pathogens including the Hendra and Nipah viruses and the recently identified human metapneumovirus. Two major envelope glycoproteins, the attachment protein and the fusion protein, promote the processes of viral attachment and virus-cell membrane fusion required for entry. Although common mechanisms of fusion protein proteolytic activation and the mechanism of membrane fusion promotion have been shown in recent years, considerable diversity exists in the family relating to receptor binding and the potential mechanisms of fusion triggering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of paramyxovirus virion and surface glycoproteins
A) Schematic of a paramyxovirus; viral membrane shown in blue. B) Conserved domains of paramyxovirus fusion and attachment proteins. Domain abbreviations: fusion peptide (FP, orange); heptad repeat A (HRA, blue); heptad repeat B (HRB, red); transmembrane domain (TMD, black); cytoplasmic tail (C-Tail, dotted box); disulfide bond (S-S).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Potential mechanisms of paramyxovirus fusion protein triggering
Attachment protein shown with orange head domain and blue stalk, fusion protein shown in blue/green head domain and red stalk region, receptor shown in grey.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Models of lipid and protein fusion intermediates
A) Lipid intermediates culminating in the formation of a full fusion pore. B) Proposed fusion protein intermediates with subsequent formation of the post-fusion six-helix bundle. Fusion peptide,orange; heptad repeat A, blue; heptad repeat B, red; transmembrane domain, black.

References

    1. Lamb RA, Parks GD. Paramyxoviridae: the viruses and their replication. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields Virology. Lippincott: Williams and Wilkins; 2007. pp. 1449–1496.
    1. Eaton BT, Broder CC, Middleton D, Wang LF. Hendra and Nipah viruses: different and dangerous. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:23–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ludwig K, Schade B, Bottcher C, Korte T, Ohlwein N, Baljinnyam B, Veit M, Herrmann A. Electron cryomicroscopy reveals different F1+F2 protein States in intact parainfluenza virions. J Virol. 2008;82:3775–3781. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tong S, Compans RW. Alternative mechanisms of interaction between homotypic and heterotypic parainfluenza virus HN and F proteins. J. Gen. Virol. 1999;80:107–115. - PubMed
    1. Cattaneo R, Rose JK. Cell fusion by the envelope glycoproteins of persistent measles viruses which cause lethal human brain disease. J. Virol. 1993;67:1493–1502. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances