Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation
- PMID: 19879394
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.015
Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation
Abstract
Objective: We compared survival for women with early-stage cervical cancer who were treated with primary radiation or radical hysterectomy.
Study design: Patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database with stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer were examined. Radical hysterectomy was compared with primary combination external-beam and brachytherapy radiation.
Results: A total of 4885 patients were identified. Multivariate analysis showed that radical hysterectomy was associated with a 59% reduction in mortality rate (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.50). After stratification by tumor size, hysterectomy was associated with a 62% reduction in mortality rate (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.30-0.48) for tumors that were <4 cm in diameter and a 49% improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36-0.72) for tumors that were 4-6 cm in diameter. Among women with tumors that were >6 cm in size, survival was equivalent between radical hysterectomy and radiation.
Conclusion: Our data indicate that, in women with cervical cancer lesions of <6 cm, radical hysterectomy is superior to primary radiation.
Comment in
-
Examining cancer therapy outcomes using observational data.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):e18-9; author reply e19-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.052. Epub 2010 Apr 24. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20417472 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical