Wishing upon a STAR*D: the promise of ideal depression care by primary care providers
- PMID: 19880461
- PMCID: PMC4670562
- DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.11.1460
Wishing upon a STAR*D: the promise of ideal depression care by primary care providers
Abstract
The Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial found that after initial treatment, depressed patients treated in primary care settings had the same or slightly better outcomes than those treated in specialty care settings. The authors describe challenges to using the STAR*D approach and protocols in usual primary care settings. These include inadequate availability of appointments, insufficient resources for care management and treatment monitoring, and lack of payment to primary care providers for providing mental health care. Substantial reengineering of payment and delivery systems is needed in order for the STAR*D approach to be viable in primary care clinics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Primary versus specialty care outcomes for depressed outpatients managed with measurement-based care: results from STAR*D.J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):551-60. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0522-3. Epub 2008 Feb 5. J Gen Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18247097 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
STAR*D: helping to close the gap between science and practice.Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Nov;60(11):1458-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.11.1458. Psychiatr Serv. 2009. PMID: 19880460 Clinical Trial.
-
Acceptability of second-step treatments to depressed outpatients: a STAR*D report.Am J Psychiatry. 2007 May;164(5):753-60. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.5.753. Am J Psychiatry. 2007. PMID: 17475734 Clinical Trial.
-
Background and rationale for the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) study.Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;26(2):457-94, x. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(02)00107-7. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2003. PMID: 12778843 Review.
-
[Escitalopram versus citalopram in true depression. Review of studies do not support clinically relevant differences of the effect].Lakartidningen. 2009 Mar 18-24;106(12):858-61. Lakartidningen. 2009. PMID: 19452787 Review. Swedish. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
HCET: Hierarchical Clinical Embedding With Topic Modeling on Electronic Health Records for Predicting Future Depression.IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Apr;25(4):1265-1272. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.3004072. Epub 2021 Apr 6. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021. PMID: 32749975 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of comprehensive behavioral health parity on choice of provider.Med Care. 2012 Jun;50(6):527-33. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318245a60f. Med Care. 2012. PMID: 22584888 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gilbody SP, Bower P, Fletcher J, et al. Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2006;166:2314–2321. - PubMed
-
- Gilbody SP, Bower P, Whitty P. Costs and consequences of enhanced primary care for depression: systematic review of randomised economic evaluations. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2006;189:297–308. - PubMed
-
- Screening for Depression. Rockville, Md: US Preventive Services Task Force; May, 2002. Available at www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsdepr.htm.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources