When a problem-based learning tutor decides to intervene

Abstract

Purpose: To appropriately contribute to group discussion, tutors should be experts in their field and possess facilitative skills. However, knowing when to interject is always a difficult question. This study investigated the specific scenarios or cues during group tutorial sessions that prompted or motivated tutors to interject and participate in the group discussion.

Method: From 2005 through 2008, the authors, using the interpersonal process recall method, videotaped 40 tutorial discussions led by eight experienced tutors from the departments of medicine, nursing, and clinical psychology. The tutors were later shown the tapes and asked to explore their intentions and analyze the contexts for the 636 episodes in which they had intervened in the discussions.

Results: Qualitative analyses revealed three themes for the tutors' interventions: (1) Tutorial group process included 10 categories related to discussion sequence, students' roles, and group dynamics, (2) quality of discussion included nine categories related to clarity and accuracy of the information brought forward by the students, and relevance and critical appraisal of the information in relation to the major objectives, and (3) quality and quantity of the materials discussed included eight categories related to amount, datedness, accuracy, representativeness, and source (whether primary or secondary).

Conclusions: These findings provide valuable insights into the contextual situations that lead problem-based learning tutors to intervene and provide material to build a framework for training new tutors.