Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;1(2):105-9.
doi: 10.4055/cios.2009.1.2.105. Epub 2009 May 30.

Revision total hip arthroplasty using an extensively porous coated femoral stem

Affiliations

Revision total hip arthroplasty using an extensively porous coated femoral stem

Kyoung Ho Moon et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Background: To determine the benefit of an extensively porous coated femoral stem in patients receiving revision total hip arthroplasty.

Methods: This study reviewed the results of 35 patients who received a revision total hip arthroplasty with extensively porous coated femoral stem between August, 1996, and December, 2002. The mean follow-up period was 77.5 months. The clinical and radiological results were evaluated by the Harris hip score and serial roentgenographic findings.

Results: The preoperative and postoperative Harris hip score was 68.3 and 92.5, respectively. Radiographically, none of the acetabular components showed any evidence of migration, tilt, rotation, or shedding of metal particles. In addition, none of the femoral components showed evidence of subsidence, pedestal, or shedding of metal particles. Twenty-two hips had a mild stress shield and 2 hips had a moderate stress shield. The perioperative complications encountered were deep vein thrombosis (1 case), mild heterotopic ossification (4 cases), intraoperative periprosthetic fractures (1 case), and nonunion of the trochanteric osteotomy site (2 cases).

Conclusions: Extensively porous coated femoral stems and acetabular components produce excellent clinical and radiological results in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Keywords: Extensively porous coated femoral stem; Revision total hip arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Radiographs show a 59 year-old man with periprosthetic fracture. (A) Preoperative radiograph reveals a periprosthetic fracture with Paprosky type III B femoral bone defect. (B) Revision total hip arthroplasty was performed with solution bowed stem and cortical strut allo-bone. (C) Five years after revision total hip arthroplasty, grafted cortical strut allo-bone had been incorporated .

References

    1. Ng FY, Chiu KY, Yau WP, Ng TP, Tang WM. Extensively coated femoral components in revision hip arthroplasty: follow-up study of 23 patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2004;12(2):168–172. - PubMed
    1. Huddleston HD. Femoral lysis after cemented hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1988;3(4):285–297. - PubMed
    1. Mallory TH. Preparation of the proximal femur in cementless total hip revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(235):47–60. - PubMed
    1. Paprosky WG, Burnett RS. Extensively porous-coated femoral stems in revision hip arthroplasty: rationale and results. Am J Orthop. 2002;31(8):471–474. - PubMed
    1. Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4) Suppl 1:134–137. - PubMed

Substances