Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep;2(5):802-8.
doi: 10.1177/193229680800200508.

An electronic protocol for translation of research results to clinical practice: a preliminary report

Collaborators, Affiliations

An electronic protocol for translation of research results to clinical practice: a preliminary report

Alan H Morris et al. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluated the feasibility of using an electronic protocol developed for research use (Research-eProtocol-insulin) for blood glucose management in usual intensive care unit clinical practice.

Methods: We implemented the rules of Research-eProtocol-insulin in the electronic medical record of the Intermountain Healthcare hospital system (Clinical-eProtocol-insulin) for use in usual clinical practice. We evaluated the performance of Clinical-eProtocol-insulin rules in the intensive care units of seven Intermountain Healthcare hospitals and compared this performance with the performance of Research-eProtocol-insulin at the LDS Hospital Shock/Trauma/Respiratory Intensive Care Unit.

Results: Clinician (nurse or physician) compliance with computerized protocol recommendations was 95% (of 21,325 recommendations) with Research-eProtocol-insulin and 92% (of 109,458 recommendations) with Clinical-eProtocol-insulin. The blood glucose distribution in clinical practice (Clinical-eProtocol-insulin) was similar to the research use distribution (Research-eProtocol-insulin); however, the mean values (119 mg/dl vs 113 mg/dl) were statistically different (P = 0.0001). Hypoglycemia rates in the research and practice settings did not differ: the percentage of measurements < or =40 mg/dl (0.11% vs 0.1%, P = 0.65) and the percentage of patients with at least one blood glucose < or =40 mg/dl (4.2% vs 3%, P = 0.23) were not statistically significantly different.

Conclusion: Our electronic blood glucose protocol enabled translation of a research decision-support tool (Research-eProtocol-insulin) to usual clinical practice (Clinical-eProtocol-insulin).

Keywords: clinical; clinical protocol; computer protocol; glucose; intensive care; replicability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Single bedside Research-eProtocol-insulin computer screen. 1. Patient name and blood glucose protocol target range. 2. Data entry fields. 3. Get eProtocol-insulin recommendation button (new intravenous insulin infusion rate). 4. New insulin infusion rate recommendation with Accept or Decline checkboxes to the left (white background becomes gray after bedside clinician accepts or declines the recommendation). 5. Countdown timer displays 1 hour 59 minutes and 58 seconds to the next eProtocol-insulin-recommended blood glucose measurement (at 11:00 hours—displayed in the Next assessment window below the countdown timer). 6. Previous patient data with dates and times (this can be toggled to a graphical display with the Graph button above and to the right of the table).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Distribution of percent (%) of blood sugar measurements during usual clinical care use of eProtocol-insulin in 13 intensive care units of seven intermountain Healthcare Hospitals (+) and in the LDS Hospital Shock/Trauma/Respiratory Intensive Care Unit (•), the eProtocol-insulin research development site.

References

    1. Sterman JD. Learning from evidence in a complex world. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(3):505–514. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28(1):413–433. - PubMed
    1. Campbell D, Stanley J. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.; 1966. (reprinted from Handbook of Research on Teaching, 1963)
    1. Babbie E. Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.; 1990.
    1. Guyatt G, Sackett D, Cook D. User's guide to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention; A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA. 1993;270(21):2598–2601. - PubMed