Body composition methods: comparisons and interpretation
- PMID: 19885303
- PMCID: PMC2769821
- DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200623
Body composition methods: comparisons and interpretation
Abstract
The incidence of obesity in the United States and other developed countries is epidemic. Because the prevalence of comorbidities to obesity, such as type 2 diabetes, has also increased, it is clear there is a great need to monitor and treat obesity and its comorbidities. Body composition assessments vary in precision and in the target tissue of interest. The most common assessments are anthropometric and include weight, stature, abdominal circumference, and skinfold measurements. More complex methods include bioelectrical impedance, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, body density, and total body water estimates. There is no single universally recommended method for body composition assessment in the obese, but each modality has benefits and drawbacks. We present here the most common methods and provide guidelines by way of examples to assist the clinician/researcher in choosing methods appropriate to their situation.
Keywords: anthropometry; body composition; obesity; type 2 diabetes.
References
-
- Naser KA, Gruber A, Thomson GA. The emerging pandemic of obesity and diabetes: are we doing enough to prevent a disaster? Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60(9):1093–1097. - PubMed
-
- Seidell JC. Obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes–a worldwide epidemic. Br J Nutr. 2000;83(Suppl 1):S5–S8. - PubMed
-
- Roche A. Anthropometry and ultrasound. In: Roche A, Heymsfield S, Lohman T, editors. Human body composition. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Press; 1996. pp. 167–189.
-
- Chumlea WM, Guo SS. Assessment and prevalence of obesity: application of new methods to a major problem. Endocrine. 2000;13(2):135–142. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
