Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Dec;103(6):822-7.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aep312. Epub 2009 Nov 3.

Determination of serum propofol concentrations by breath analysis using ion mobility spectrometry

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Determination of serum propofol concentrations by breath analysis using ion mobility spectrometry

T Perl et al. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Background: We aimed to measure propofol concentrations in exhaled air with an ion mobility spectrometer coupled to a multicapillary column for pre-separation (MCC-IMS). In addition, we aimed to compare the values of these measurements with serum propofol concentrations, as determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

Methods: Thirteen patients, ASA I or II, undergoing elective ENT surgery were studied. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2.1 (0.7) mg kg(-1), rocuronium 0.5 (0.1) mg kg(-1), and remifentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1). After tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with a continuous infusion of propofol 3.9 (1.8) mg kg(-1) h(-1) and remifentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1). Simultaneously, a venous blood sample was obtained. Propofol concentrations in serum were determined by GC-MS and compared with the height of the respective propofol signals achieved by MCC-IMS.

Results: Twenty-four pairs of samples were obtained. The comparison of propofol concentrations in exhaled air and serum presented a bias of -10.5% and a precision of +/- 12.3%. With these values, the 95% limits of agreement were 14.1% and -35.1%.

Conclusions: MCC-IMS may be a suitable method to determine propofol concentrations in exhaled air, and may be used to predict propofol concentrations in serum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types