On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery
- PMID: 19890125
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902905
On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery
Abstract
Background: Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has traditionally been performed with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG). CABG without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG) might reduce the number of complications related to the heart-lung machine.
Methods: We randomly assigned 2203 patients scheduled for urgent or elective CABG to either on-pump or off-pump procedures. The primary short-term end point was a composite of death or complications (reoperation, new mechanical support, cardiac arrest, coma, stroke, or renal failure) before discharge or within 30 days after surgery. The primary long-term end point was a composite of death from any cause, a repeat revascularization procedure, or a nonfatal myocardial infarction within 1 year after surgery. Secondary end points included the completeness of revascularization, graft patency at 1 year, neuropsychological outcomes, and the use of major resources.
Results: There was no significant difference between off-pump and on-pump CABG in the rate of the 30-day composite outcome (7.0% and 5.6%, respectively; P=0.19). The rate of the 1-year composite outcome was higher for off-pump than for on-pump CABG (9.9% vs. 7.4%, P=0.04). The proportion of patients with fewer grafts completed than originally planned was higher with off-pump CABG than with on-pump CABG (17.8% vs. 11.1%, P<0.001). Follow-up angiograms in 1371 patients who underwent 4093 grafts revealed that the overall rate of graft patency was lower in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group (82.6% vs. 87.8%, P<0.01). There were no treatment-based differences in neuropsychological outcomes or short-term use of major resources.
Conclusions: At 1 year of follow-up, patients in the off-pump group had worse composite outcomes and poorer graft patency than did patients in the on-pump group. No significant differences between the techniques were found in neuropsychological outcomes or use of major resources. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00032630.).
Copyright 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Innovation and comparative-effectiveness research in cardiac surgery.N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 5;361(19):1897-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0907887. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19890133 No abstract available.
-
On-pump versus off-pump CABG.N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):851; author reply 853-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0912190. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20200392 No abstract available.
-
On-pump versus off-pump CABG.N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):852; author reply 853-4. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20213877 No abstract available.
-
On-pump versus off-pump CABG.N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):852; author reply 853-4. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20213878 No abstract available.
-
On-pump versus off-pump CABG.N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):852; author reply 853-4. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20213879 No abstract available.
-
On-pump versus off-pump CABG.N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):852-3; author reply 853-4. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20213880 No abstract available.
-
[Coronary artery bypass surgery with or without use of extracorporeal circulation].Kardiol Pol. 2010 Jan;68(1):125-7. Kardiol Pol. 2010. PMID: 20225415 Polish. No abstract available.
-
Using pump for bypass surgery--on-off-on again?Crit Care. 2010;14(5):319. doi: 10.1186/cc9248. Epub 2010 Sep 16. Crit Care. 2010. PMID: 20854647 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical