Interrogating the dynamics between power, knowledge and pregnant bodies in amniocentesis decision making
- PMID: 19891618
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01197.x
Interrogating the dynamics between power, knowledge and pregnant bodies in amniocentesis decision making
Abstract
A common assumption is that women who decline prenatal testing distrust biomedicine and trust embodied/experiential knowledge sources, while women who accept testing trust biomedicine and distrust embodied/experiential sources. Another major assumption about prenatal testing utilisation is that women who are open to abortion will undergo prenatal testing while those who are opposed to abortion will decline testing. Yet, previous research has produced inconsistent findings as to what, if anything, distinguishes women who accept or decline the offer of prenatal diagnosis. Analysing interviews with 147 pregnant women, this paper questions these assumptions about the role of abortion views and pregnant women's relative trust in various knowledge sources on their decisions to accept or decline an amniocentesis offer after a positive result on an initial diagnostic screening. We found that pregnant women's attitudes toward different knowledge sources were equally, if not more, important factors than abortion views in affecting whether individual women accepted or declined amniocentesis. At the same time, our data reveal that the relationship between 'expert' and 'lay' knowledge sources is often complex and synergistic.
Similar articles
-
Pregnant women's attitudes toward amniocentesis before receiving Down syndrome screening results.Womens Health Issues. 2008 Mar-Apr;18(2):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2007.10.003. Epub 2008 Jan 4. Womens Health Issues. 2008. PMID: 18180167 Clinical Trial.
-
Attitudes about abortion of women who undergo prenatal diagnosis.Res Sociol Health Care. 1991;9:49-73. Res Sociol Health Care. 1991. PMID: 12317576
-
Factors affecting the decision regarding amniocentesis in women at genetic risk because of age 35 years or older.Prenat Diagn. 2002 Sep;22(9):769-74. doi: 10.1002/pd.405. Prenat Diagn. 2002. PMID: 12224068
-
Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(12):1420-5. doi: 10.1080/00016340600985198. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006. PMID: 17260215 Review.
-
Probabilities and health risks: a qualitative approach.Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(9):1295-306. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00205-6. Soc Sci Med. 1998. PMID: 9783872 Review.
Cited by
-
Experiences and expectations in the first trimester of pregnancy: a qualitative study.Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1320-1329. doi: 10.1111/hex.12572. Epub 2017 May 18. Health Expect. 2017. PMID: 28521069 Free PMC article.
-
Negotiating mental illness across the lay-professional divide: Role play in peer work consultations.Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Apr;44(4-5):815-829. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13456. Epub 2022 Mar 5. Sociol Health Illn. 2022. PMID: 35247209 Free PMC article.
-
Experience as knowledge: Disability, distillation and (reprogenetic) decision-making.Soc Sci Med. 2017 Oct;191:186-193. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Sep 8. Soc Sci Med. 2017. PMID: 28926777 Free PMC article.
-
Coping with worry while waiting for diagnostic results: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant couples following a high-risk prenatal screening result.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1114-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 27769247 Free PMC article.
-
Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.Birth Defects Res. 2020 Mar 1;112(4):332-338. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1651. Birth Defects Res. 2020. PMID: 32115901 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical