Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb;25(2):150-3.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1161-z. Epub 2009 Nov 6.

Code status documentation in the outpatient electronic medical records of patients with metastatic cancer

Jennifer S Temel  1 , Joseph A Greer, Sonal Admane, Jessica Solis, Barbara J Cashavelly, Stephen Doherty, Rebecca Heist, William F Pirl
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Code status documentation in the outpatient electronic medical records of patients with metastatic cancer

Jennifer S Temel et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Advanced care planning (ACP) is considered an essential component of medical care in the United States, especially in patients with incurable diseases. However, little is known about clinical practices in outpatient oncology settings related to discussing end-of-life care and documenting code status preferences in ambulatory medical records.

Objective: To assess the rate of documentation of code status in the electronic longitudinal medical records (LMR) of patients with metastatic cancer.

Design: Retrospective review of 2,498 patients with metastatic solid tumors at an academic cancer center. An electronic patient database and the LMR were queried to identify demographic information, cancer type, number of clinic visits, and documentation of code status.

Participants: The sample consisted of adult patients with metastatic prostate, breast, ovarian, bladder kidney, colorectal, non-colorectal gastrointestinal (GI), and lung cancers.

Measurements: Primary outcome was the percentage of documented code status in the LMR.

Main results: Among the 2,498 patients, 20.3% had a documented code status. Code status was designated most frequently in patients with non-colorectal GI (193/609, 31.7%) and lung (179/583, 30.7%) cancers and least frequently in patients with genitourinary malignancies [bladder/kidney (4/89, 4.5%), ovarian (4/93, 4.3%), and prostate (7/365, 1.9%) cancers]. Independent predictors of having documented code status included religious affiliation, cancer type, and a greater number of visits to the cancer center. Younger patients and black patients were less likely to be designated as DNR/DNI.

Conclusions: Despite the incurable nature of metastatic cancer, only a minority of patients had a code status documented in the electronic medical record.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JD, Ettelson LM, Emanuel EJ. Advance directives for medical care—a case for greater use. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(13):889–895. - PubMed
    1. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. Jama. 1995;274(20):1591–8. - PubMed
    1. Teno JM, Licks S, Lynn J, et al. Do advance directives provide instructions that direct care? SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.[see comment] J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(4):508–512. - PubMed
    1. Lo B, Steinbrook R. Resuscitating advance directives. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(14):1501–1506. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.14.1501. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perkins HS. Controlling death: the false promise of advance directives. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(1):51–57. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources