Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;27(2):325-30.
doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1115.

Interobserver variability in the assessment of CT imaging features of traumatic brain injury

Kimberly A Chun  1 , Geoffrey T Manley, Shirley I Stiver, Ashley H Aiken, Nicholas Phan, Vincent Wang, Michele Meeker, Su-Chun Cheng, A D Gean, Max Wintermark
Affiliations

Interobserver variability in the assessment of CT imaging features of traumatic brain injury

Kimberly A Chun et al. J Neurotrauma. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

The goal of our study was to determine the interobserver variability between observers with different backgrounds and experience when interpreting computed tomography (CT) imaging features of traumatic brain injury (TBI). We retrospectively identified a consecutive series of 50 adult patients admitted at our institution with a suspicion of TBI, and displaying a Glasgow Coma Scale score < or =12. Noncontrast CT (NCT) studies were anonymized and sent to five reviewers with different backgrounds and levels of experience, who independently reviewed each NCT scan. Each reviewer assessed multiple CT imaging features of TBI and assigned every NCT scan a Marshall and a Rotterdam grading score. The interobserver agreement and coefficient of variation were calculated for individual CT imaging features of TBI as well as for the two scores. Our results indicated that the imaging review by both neuroradiologists and neurosurgeons were consistent with each other. The kappa coefficient of agreement for all CT characteristics showed no significant difference in interpretation between the neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists. The average Bland and Altman coefficients of variation for the Marshall and Rotterdam classification systems were 12.7% and 21.9%, respectively, which indicates acceptable agreement among all five reviewers. In conclusion, there is good interobserver reproducibility between neuroradiologists and neurosurgeons in the interpretation of CT imaging features of TBI and calculation of Marshall and Rotterdam scores.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Altman D.G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall; London: 1991. pp. 404–408.
    1. Borg J. Holm L. Cassidy J.D. Peloso P.M. Carroll L.J. von Holst H. Ericson K. Diagnostic procedures in mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Rehabil. Med. 2004;(43 Suppl.):61–75. - PubMed
    1. Chestnut R. Ghajar J. Maas A.I. Management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Early indicators of prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2000;17:557–627.
    1. Doppenberg E.M. Choi S.C. Bullock R. Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury. What can we learn from previous studies? Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1997;825:305–322. - PubMed
    1. Eisenberg H.M. Gary H.E., Jr. Aldrich E.F. Saydjari C. Turner B. Foulkes M.A. Jane J.A. Marmarou A. Marshall L.F. Young H.F. Initial CT findings in 753 patients with severe head injury. A report from the NIH Traumatic Coma Data Bank. J. Neurosurg. 1990;73:688–698. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources