Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct 30;326(5953):682-8.
doi: 10.1126/science.1178336.

Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies

Affiliations

Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies

Monique Borgerhoff Mulder et al. Science. .

Abstract

Small-scale human societies range from foraging bands with a strong egalitarian ethos to more economically stratified agrarian and pastoral societies. We explain this variation in inequality using a dynamic model in which a population's long-run steady-state level of inequality depends on the extent to which its most important forms of wealth are transmitted within families across generations. We estimate the degree of intergenerational transmission of three different types of wealth (material, embodied, and relational), as well as the extent of wealth inequality in 21 historical and contemporary populations. We show that intergenerational transmission of wealth and wealth inequality are substantial among pastoral and small-scale agricultural societies (on a par with or even exceeding the most unequal modern industrial economies) but are limited among horticultural and foraging peoples (equivalent to the most egalitarian of modern industrial populations). Differences in the technology by which a people derive their livelihood and in the institutions and norms making up the economic system jointly contribute to this pattern.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Populations studied
Note: Circle indicates hunter-gatherers, star horticulturalists; square pastoralists, and triangle agriculturalists.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Steady-state wealth distribution
The dashed line is the steady-state condition requiring wealth inequality to be unchanging from one period to the next. The solid line (equation 2) is the combined effect of this period’s variance of shocks (the constant) augmented by the inequalities in wealth transmitted from the previous period (the slope).

Comment in

References

    1. Atkinson A. In: Studies in Deprivation and Disadvantage: Parents and Children: Incomes in Two Generations. Atkinson AB, Maynard AK, Trinder CG, editors. Heinemann Educational Books; London: 1983. pp. 94–114.
    1. Becker GS, Tomes N. Journal of Political Economy. 1979;87:1153.
    1. Bowles S, Gintis H. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2002;16:3.
    1. Bjorklund A, Jantti M. In: Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality. Salverda W, Nolan B, Smeeding T, editors. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 2009. pp. 491–521.
    1. Hertz T, Jayasundera T, Piraino P, Selcuk S, Smith N, Veraschchagina A. BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy. 2007;7 Article 10.

Publication types