Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Dec;124(6):e1180-8.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0679. Epub 2009 Nov 9.

HIV risk reduction among detained adolescents: a randomized, controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

HIV risk reduction among detained adolescents: a randomized, controlled trial

Angela D Bryan et al. Pediatrics. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Criminally involved adolescents engage in high levels of alcohol-related risky sex. A theory-based sexual and alcohol risk-reduction intervention was designed, implemented, and evaluated in juvenile detention facilities.

Participants and methods: In a randomized, controlled trial, 484 detained adolescents received 1 of 3 group-based interventions: combined sexual and alcohol risk reduction (group psychosocial intervention [GPI] + group motivational enhancement therapy [GMET]); sexual risk reduction only (GPI); or HIV/sexually transmitted disease prevention information only (group information-only intervention [GINFO]). Follow-up data were obtained 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the intervention. Behavioral outcomes were condom-use behavior, frequency of intercourse while drinking, and alcohol-related problems.

Results: Condom-use behavior measured as frequency of condom use during sex (ranging from never to always) decreased over time, although the GPI and GPI + GMET interventions mitigated this tendency at the 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-up assessments. Although both active interventions were significantly more successful than the GINFO condition and the pattern of effects favored the GPI + GMET, there were no statistically significant differences between the GPI and GPI + GMET interventions.

Conclusions: Findings support the feasibility of integrating alcohol-specific sexual risk content into a theory-based sexual risk-reduction intervention and provide additional evidence that theory-based interventions are effective at reducing risky sex in this population. There was limited evidence of intervention effects on alcohol-use outcomes. Future research should focus on strengthening the GPI + GMET to most effectively target risky sexual behavior among at-risk adolescents.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00914719.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Diagram of participant flow through the waves of the study according to condition.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Observed and model estimated means for condom use according to condition. Note that the original model estimated demonstrated marginal fit to the data ( χ262[n=484]=62.92; P < .05; root-mean-square error of approximation [RMSEA]: 0.07 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04 – 0.10]; comparative fit index [CFI]: 0.87). Using an exploratory approach, we estimated improvements to model fit by allowing correlations among residual error variances. The final estimated model demonstrated good fit to the data ( χ322[n=484]=45.12, NS; RMSEA: 0.05 [95% CI: 0.00–0.09]; CFI: 0.94).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Observed and model estimated means for frequency of intercourse while drinking according to condition. Note that the original model estimated demonstrated marginal fit to the data ( χ362[n=484]=57.97; P < .05; RMSEA: 0.06 [95% CI: 0.03–0.09]; CFI: 0.75). Following the same approach of allowing correlations among residual error variances, the final estimated model demonstrated good fit to the data ( χ322[n=484]=37.13, NS; RMSEA: 0.03 [95% CI: 0.00–0.07]; CFI: 0.95).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
RAPI means at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up according to condition.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Young People at Risk: HIV/AIDS Among America’s Youth. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2002.
    1. Whaley AL. Preventing the high-risk sexual behavior of adolescents: focus on HIV/AIDS transmission, unintended pregnancy, or both? J Adolesc Health. 1999;24(6):376–382. - PubMed
    1. Barthlow DJ, Horan PF, DiClemente RJ, Lanier MM. Correlates of condom use among incarcerated adolescents in a rural state. Crim Just Behav. 1995;22(3):295–306.
    1. Teplin LA, Mericle AA, McClelland GM, Abram KM. HIV and AIDS risk behaviors in juvenile detainees: implications for public health policy. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):906–912. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malow RM, Rosenberg R, Donenberg G, Devieux JG. Interventions and patterns of risk in adolescent HIV/AIDS prevention. Am J Infect Dis. 2006;2(2):80–89. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data