Faculty guide to the institutional review board process
- PMID: 19901736
- DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181bc7450
Faculty guide to the institutional review board process
Abstract
With the emphasis on research for professional advancement, faculty members require expertise in navigating the institutional review board (IRB) process for studies involving human subjects. Since IRBs often differ in their interpretation of federal guidelines, the process may prove confusing to novice as well as experienced researchers, leading to costly mistakes in projected timeframes and funding of research projects. The author provides a practical guide for successfully preparing and submitting research protocols to IRBs.
Similar articles
-
The flip of the coin: exempt, expedited, or full IRB review?AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007 Apr-Jun;18(2):213-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AACN.0000269265.29665.29. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007. PMID: 17473550 No abstract available.
-
The Office of Human Research Protections.Clin Nurse Spec. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):268. doi: 10.1097/01.NUR.0000325380.14965.39. Clin Nurse Spec. 2008. PMID: 18955842 No abstract available.
-
Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.Hum Res Rep. 2003 Jun;18(6):6-7. Hum Res Rep. 2003. PMID: 15119342 No abstract available.
-
Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.J Health Care Law Policy. 2005;8(2):264-330. J Health Care Law Policy. 2005. PMID: 16471026 Review. No abstract available.
-
Working with human research protections.J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(3):265-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.04048.x. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004. PMID: 15495497 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources