Disparities in trauma center access despite increasing utilization: data from California, 1999 to 2006
- PMID: 19901854
- PMCID: PMC2805766
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a0e66d
Disparities in trauma center access despite increasing utilization: data from California, 1999 to 2006
Abstract
Background: Although efforts have been made to address disparities in access to trauma care in the past decade, there is little evidence to show if utilization has changed. We use patient-level data to describe the changes in utilization of trauma centers (TCs) in an 8-year period in California.
Methods: We analyzed all statewide trauma admissions (n = 752,706) using the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Discharge Patient Discharge Database from the period of 1999 to 2006, and determined the trends in admissions and place of care.
Results: The proportion of severe injuries admitted increased by 3.6% (p < 0.05), with a concomitant rise in the proportion of patients with trauma to TCs, from 39.3% (95% CI: 39.0%-39.7%) to 49.7% (49.4%-50.0%). Within the severely injured with injury severity scores (ISS) >15, 82.4% were treated in a TC if they resided in a county with a TC, compared with 30.8% of patients who did not live in a county with a TC. After adjustment, patients living greater than 50 miles away from a TC still had a likelihood ratio of 0.11 (p < 0.0001) of receiving care in a TC compared with those less than 10 miles away. Similarly, even severely injured patients not living in a county with a TC had a likelihood ratio of 0.35 (p < 0.0001) of being admitted to a TC compared with those residing in counties with TCs.
Conclusion: Admissions to TCs for all categories of injury severity are increasing. There remains, however, a large disparity in TC care depending on geographical distance and availability of a TC within county.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Factors associated with trauma center use for elderly patients with trauma: a statewide analysis, 1999-2008.Arch Surg. 2011 May;146(5):585-92. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.311. Epub 2011 Jan 17. Arch Surg. 2011. PMID: 21242421 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of trauma center care on pediatric injury mortality in California, 1999 to 2011.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Oct;75(4):704-16. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829a0a65. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013. PMID: 24064887 Free PMC article.
-
Variability in pediatric utilization of trauma facilities in California: 1999 to 2005.Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;52(6):607-15. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Jun 18. Ann Emerg Med. 2008. PMID: 18562043
-
Trauma center versus non-trauma center admissions in adult trauma victims by age and gender.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004 Jul-Sep;8(3):268-72. doi: 10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.027. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004. PMID: 15295726
-
Factors contributing to disparities in trauma care between urban vs rural trauma centers: Towards improving trauma care access and quality of care delivery.Injury. 2024 Dec;55(12):112017. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.112017. Epub 2024 Nov 7. Injury. 2024. PMID: 39531788 Review.
Cited by
-
The association of trauma center closures with increased inpatient mortality for injured patients.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Apr;76(4):1048-54. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000166. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014. PMID: 24625549 Free PMC article.
-
Physiologic field triage criteria for identifying seriously injured older adults.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4):461-70. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.912707. Epub 2014 Jun 16. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014. PMID: 24933614 Free PMC article.
-
CDC field triage criteria accurately predicts outcomes in high impact trauma.J Inj Violence Res. 2022 Jan;14(1):115-124. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v14i1.1650. Epub 2022 Feb 7. J Inj Violence Res. 2022. PMID: 35137693 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison and interpretability of machine learning models to predict severity of chest injury.JAMIA Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(1):ooab015. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab015. eCollection 2021 Jan. JAMIA Open. 2021. PMID: 33709067 Free PMC article.
-
Incorporating the six aims for quality in the analysis of trauma care.Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2021 Jul 20;11(2):98-108. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2021.1906763. eCollection 2022. Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2021. PMID: 35655611 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Celso B, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems. J Trauma. 2006;60(2):371–8. discussion 378. - PubMed
-
- MacKenzie EJ. Review of evidence regarding trauma system effectiveness resulting from panel studies. J Trauma. 1999;47(3 Suppl):S34–41. - PubMed
-
- MacKenzie EJ, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):366–78. - PubMed
-
- Mullins RJ, Mann NC. Population-based research assessing the effectiveness of trauma systems. J Trauma. 1999;47(3 Suppl):S59–66. - PubMed
-
- Mullins RJ, et al. Preferential benefit of implementation of a statewide trauma system in one of two adjacent states. J Trauma. 1998;44(4):609–16. discussion 617. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous