Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000109.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000109. Epub 2009 Sep 8.

Male circumcision for HIV prevention in high HIV prevalence settings: what can mathematical modelling contribute to informed decision making?

Collaborators
Review

Male circumcision for HIV prevention in high HIV prevalence settings: what can mathematical modelling contribute to informed decision making?

UNAIDS/WHO/SACEMA Expert Group on Modelling the Impact and Cost of Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention. PLoS Med. 2009 Sep.

Erratum in

  • PLoS Med. 2009 Dec;6(12). doi: 10.1371/annotation/f1c3679d-18d8-4fbd-bd3f-59db0b284b19

Abstract

Experts from UNAIDS, WHO, and the South African Centre for Epidemiological Modelling report their review of mathematical models estimating the impact of male circumcision on HIV incidence in high HIV prevalence settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Reductions in HIV incidence by coverage level.
This figure shows model estimates for the reduction in HIV incidence 10 y after the programme begins, among circumcised men, women, uncircumcised men, and the population overall, at varying levels of circumcision uptake (from a baseline of 0%). The model is a deterministic compartmental simulation of the heterosexual spread of HIV in a sex- and sexual-activity stratified population, parameterised for Southern and Eastern African populations. The model assumes that there is a 60% reduction in female-to-male transmission for circumcised men, that there is no direct reduction in male-to-female transmission from circumcised men, and that 5%, 20%, 35%, 50%, 70%, and 90% of men are circumcised within 10 y of the intervention being scaled-up. Note: Since the fraction of men circumcised increases over time, the weighted-average of reductions in incidence in these demographic groups at year 10 is not expected to equal the reduction in incidence in the whole population over the first 10 y of the intervention.

References

    1. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, et al. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369:643–656. - PubMed
    1. Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;369:657–666. - PubMed
    1. Weiss HA, Quigley MA, Hayes RJ. Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2000;14:2361–2370. - PubMed
    1. Weiss HA, Halperin D, Bailey RC, Hayes RJ, Schmid G, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention: from evidence to action? AIDS. 2008;22:567–574. - PubMed

Publication types