Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;27(5):674-83.
doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v27i5.3779.

Technical and social evaluation of arsenic mitigation in rural Bangladesh

Md Shafiquzzaman  1 , Md Shafiul Azam, Iori Mishima, Jun Nakajima
Affiliations

Technical and social evaluation of arsenic mitigation in rural Bangladesh

Md Shafiquzzaman et al. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Technical and social performances of an arsenic-removal technology--the sono arsenic filter--in rural areas of Bangladesh were investigated. Results of arsenic field-test showed that filtered water met the Bangladesh standard (< 50 microg/L) after two years of continuous use. A questionnaire was administrated among 198 sono arsenic filter-user and 230 non-user families. Seventy-two percent of filters (n = 198) were working at the time of the survey. Another 28% of the filters were abandoned due to breakage. The abandonment percentage (28%) was lower than other mitigation options currently implemented in Bangladesh. Households were reluctant to repair the broken filters on their own. High cost, problems with maintenance of filters, weak sludge-disposal guidance, and slow flow rate were the other demerits of the filter. These results indicate that the implementation approaches of the sono arsenic filter suffered from lack of ownership and long-term sustainability. Continuous use of arsenic-contaminated tubewells by the non-user households demonstrated the lack of alternative water supply in the survey area. Willingness of households to pay (about 30%) and preference of household filter (50%) suggest the need to develop a low-cost household arsenic filter. Development of community-based organization would be also necessary to implement a long-term, sustainable plan for household-based technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Comparison of arsenic test results between AAS and field test-kit (Gastec)
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Range of arsenic in tubewell water (n=95)
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Arsenic-removal performance of SAF after 2 years of continuous use (n=41)
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Previously-used technologies and reason for abandoning in the NU group (n=68)
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Reason for using arsenic-contaminated tubewells in the NU group (n=95)
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Technology preferred by households
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Willingness to pay for filter
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. British Geological Survey. xvii. Dhaka: Department of Public Health Engineering; 2000. Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh. V. 1–3. Main report.
    1. National Arsenic Mitigation Information Center. Dhaka: National Arsenic Mitigation Information Center; 2004. Upazila-wise summary of screening results; p. 2. ( http://www.bamwsp.org, accessed on 22 September 2008).
    1. Chowdhury UK, Biswas BK, Chowdhury TR, Samanta G, Mandal BK, Basu GC, et al. Groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India. Environ Health Persp. 2000;108:393–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nickson R, McArthur J, Burgess W, Ahmed KM, Ravenscroft P, Rahman M. Arsenic poisoning of Bangladesh groundwater. Nature. 1998;395:338. - PubMed
    1. Yu WH, Harvey CM, Harvey CF. Arsenic groundwater in Bangladesh: a geostatistical and epidemiological framework for evaluating health effects and potential remedies. Water Resourc Res. 2003;39:1146–62.

Publication types