Can we predict daily adherence to warfarin?: Results from the International Normalized Ratio Adherence and Genetics (IN-RANGE) Study
- PMID: 19903973
- PMCID: PMC2851552
- DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-0039
Can we predict daily adherence to warfarin?: Results from the International Normalized Ratio Adherence and Genetics (IN-RANGE) Study
Abstract
Background: Warfarin is the primary therapy to prevent stroke and venous thromboembolism. Significant periods of nonadherence frequently go unreported by patients and undetected by providers. Currently, no comprehensive screening tool exists to help providers assess the risk of nonadherence at the time of initiation of warfarin therapy.
Methods: This article reports on a prospective cohort study of adults initiating warfarin therapy at two anticoagulation clinics (university- and Veterans Affairs-affiliated). Nonadherence, defined by failure to record a correct daily pill bottle opening, was measured daily by electronic pill cap monitoring. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to develop a point system to predict daily nonadherence to warfarin.
Results: We followed 114 subjects for a median of 141 days. Median nonadherence of the participants was 14.4% (interquartile range [IQR], 5.8-33.8). A point system, based on nine demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors, distinguished those demonstrating low vs high levels of nonadherence: four points or fewer, median nonadherence 5.8% (IQR, 2.3-14.1); five points, 9.1% (IQR, 5.9-28.6); six points, 14.5% (IQR, 7.1-24.1); seven points, 14.7% (IQR, 7.0-34.7); and eight points or more, 29.3% (IQR, 15.5-41.9). The model produces a c-statistic of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.61-0.71), suggesting modest discriminating ability to predict day-level warfarin nonadherence.
Conclusions: Poor adherence to warfarin is common. A screening tool based on nine demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors, if further validated in other patient populations, may help to identify groups of patients at lower risk for nonadherence so that intensified efforts at increased monitoring and intervention can be focused on higher-risk patients.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Association Between Patient-Reported Medication Adherence and Anticoagulation Control.Am J Med. 2017 Sep;130(9):1092-1098.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.03.038. Epub 2017 Apr 26. Am J Med. 2017. PMID: 28454906 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for nonadherence to warfarin: results from the IN-RANGE study.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Sep;17(9):853-60. doi: 10.1002/pds.1556. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008. PMID: 18271059 Free PMC article.
-
Nonadherence with INR monitoring and anticoagulant complications.Thromb Res. 2013 Aug;132(2):e124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jun 22. Thromb Res. 2013. PMID: 23800635
-
Factors Affecting Patients' Perception On, and Adherence To, Anticoagulant Therapy: Anticipating the Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.Patient. 2017 Apr;10(2):163-185. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0180-1. Patient. 2017. PMID: 27438598 Review.
-
Medication taking behaviors in patients taking warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants: A systematic review.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2019 Jun;17(6):427-434. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2019.1620600. Epub 2019 May 29. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2019. PMID: 31100208
Cited by
-
Dietary vitamin K intake and anticoagulation control during the initiation phase of warfarin therapy: a prospective cohort study.Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jul;110(1):195-6. doi: 10.1160/TH13-02-0111. Epub 2013 Mar 21. Thromb Haemost. 2013. PMID: 23572189 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Association between satisfaction with and adherence to warfarin therapy on the control of international normalized ratio: A hospital-based study in Saudi Arabia.Saudi Pharm J. 2018 Jan;26(1):145-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 28. Saudi Pharm J. 2018. PMID: 29379347 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between Patient-Reported Medication Adherence and Anticoagulation Control.Am J Med. 2017 Sep;130(9):1092-1098.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.03.038. Epub 2017 Apr 26. Am J Med. 2017. PMID: 28454906 Free PMC article.
-
Patient adherence to warfarin therapy and its impact on anticoagulation control.Saudi Pharm J. 2016 Jan;24(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Feb 27. Saudi Pharm J. 2016. PMID: 26903765 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2017 Sep 29;18(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2178-y. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28962662 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Kimmel SE, Chen Z, Price M, et al. The influence of patient adherence on anticoagulation control with warfarin: results from the International Normalized Ratio Adherence and Genetics (IN-RANGE) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(3):229–235. - PubMed
-
- Waterman AD, Milligan PE, Bayer L, Banet GA, Gatchel SK, Gage BF. Effect of warfarin nonadherence on control of the International Normalized Ratio. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61(12):1258–1264. - PubMed
-
- Hylek EM, Skates SJ, Sheehan MA, Singer DE. An analysis of the lowest effective intensity of prophylactic anticoagulation for patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(8):540–546. - PubMed
-
- Hylek EM, Singer DE. Risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage in outpatients taking warfarin. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120(11):897–902. - PubMed
-
- Laupacis A, Albers G, Dalen J, Dunn MI, Jacobson AK, Singer DE. Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Chest. 1998;114(suppl 5):579S–589S. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous