Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Jan;35(1):19-24.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0903-1. Epub 2009 Nov 11.

Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand

Alfonso Manzotti  1 , Pietro Cerveri, Elena De Momi, Chris Pullen, Norberto Confalonieri
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand

Alfonso Manzotti et al. Int Orthop. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Leg length discrepancy following total hip replacement (THR) can contribute to poor hip function. Abnormal gait, pain, neurological disturbance and patient dissatisfaction have all been described as a result of leg length inequality after THR. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of computer navigation in THR can improve limb length restoration and early clinical outcomes. We performed a matched-pair study comparing 48 computer-assisted THR with 48 THRs performed using a traditional freehand alignment method. The same implant with a straight non-modular femoral stem was used in all cases. The navigation system used allowed the surgeon to monitor both acetabular cup placement and all the phases of femoral stem implantation including rasping. Patients were matched for age, sex, arthritis level, pre-operative diagnosis and pre-operative leg length discrepancy. At a minimum follow-up of six months, limb length discrepancy was measured using digital radiographs and a standardised protocol. The number of patients with a residual discrepancy of 10 mm or more and/or a post-operative over-lengthening were measured. The clinical outcome was evaluated using both the Harris Hip Score and the normalised Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Arthritis Index. Restoration of limb length was significantly better in the computer-assisted THR group. The number of patients with a residual limb length discrepancy greater than 10 mm and/or a post-operative over-lengthening was significantly lower. No significant difference in the Harris Hip Score or normalised WOMAC Arthritis Index was seen between the two groups. The surgical time was significantly longer in the computer-assisted THR group. No post-operative dislocations were seen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Post-operative leg length discrepancy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Post-operative Harris Hip Score
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Post-operative normalised WOMAC Arthritis Index
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Surgical time
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Final screen shot with the data achieved
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Barrak RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11:89–99. - PubMed
    1. Bellamy N. WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:2473–2476. - PubMed
    1. Braun A, Lazovic D, Zigan R. Modular short-stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty: implant positioning and the influence of navigation. Orthopedics. 2007;30(10 Suppl):S148–S152. - PubMed
    1. Clark CR, Huddleston HD, Schoch EP, 3rd, Thomas BJ. Leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(1):38–45. - PubMed
    1. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Montironi F, Pullen C (2008) Leg length discrepancy, dislocation rate, and offset in total hip replacement using a short modular stem: navigation vs conventional freehand. Orthopedics 31(10 Suppl 1):pii:orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=35541 - PubMed

Publication types