Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;19(2):161-73.
doi: 10.1007/s10897-009-9272-6. Epub 2009 Nov 11.

Examining the relationship between genetic counselors' attitudes toward deaf people and the genetic counseling session

Affiliations

Examining the relationship between genetic counselors' attitudes toward deaf people and the genetic counseling session

Emily E Enns et al. J Genet Couns. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Given the medical and cultural perspectives on deafness it is important to determine if genetic counselors' attitudes toward deaf people can affect counseling sessions for deafness genes. One hundred fifty-eight genetic counselors recruited through the National Society of Genetic Counselors Listserv completed an online survey assessing attitudes toward deaf people and scenario-specific comfort levels discussing and offering genetic testing for deafness. Respondents with deaf/Deaf friends or who work in prenatal or pediatric settings had more positive attitudes toward deaf people than those without deaf/Deaf friends or those working in 'other' settings. More positive attitudes toward deaf people correlated with higher comfort level talking about genetic testing for the two scenarios involving culturally Deaf clients; and correlated with higher comfort level offering genetic testing to culturally Deaf clients wishing to have a deaf child. Attitudes and comfort level were not correlated in the scenarios involving hearing or non-culturally deaf clients. These results suggest that genetic counselors' attitudes could affect information provision and the decision making process of culturally Deaf clients. Cultural sensitivity workshops in genetic counseling training programs that incorporate personal interactions with culturally Deaf individuals are recommended. Additional suggestions for fostering personal interactions are provided.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Average Agreement for Attitude Statements with (SD), Where 1 Corresponds to Strongly Disagree and 6 Corresponds to Strongly Agree. Note that Fig. 1 Represents the Original Raw Survey Data Before the Negative Attitude Statements were Reverse Scored for Computation of the Total Score.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean Comfort Level When Discussing Genetic Testing for Deafness (Talk) and Offering Genetic Testing for Deafness (Offer) with (SD). Comfort Level Ranges from 1 (Uncomfortable) to 5 (Comfortable).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arnos KS, Cunningham M, Israel J, Marazita ML. Innovative approach to genetic counseling services for the deaf population. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 1992;44:345–351. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320440315. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnos KS, Israel J, Devlin L, Wilson MP. Genetic counseling for the deaf. Otolaryngology Clinics of North America. 1992;25:953–971. doi: 10.1016/S0030-6665(20)30917-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bach JR, Tilton MC. Ventilator use by muscular dystrophy association patients: an update. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation. 1992;73:179–183. - PubMed
    1. Bauman H-DL. Designing deaf babies and the question of disability. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2005;10:311–315. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eni031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brunger JW, Murray GS, O’Riordan M, Matthews AL, Smith RJ, Robin NH. Parental attitudes toward genetic testing for pediatric deafness. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2000;67:1621–1625. doi: 10.1086/316901. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types