Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;7(1):7-13.
doi: 10.1080/15459620903327970.

A task-specific assessment of Swine worker exposure to airborne dust

Patrick T O'Shaughnessy  1 , Kelley J Donham, Thomas M Peters, Craig Taylor, Ralph Altmaier, Kevin M Kelly
Affiliations

A task-specific assessment of Swine worker exposure to airborne dust

Patrick T O'Shaughnessy et al. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

A task-based analysis of personal airborne dust exposures was performed in two swine confinement facilities used to house sows and their litters. Airborne particulate levels were assessed during summer, winter, and spring. Personal aerosol measurements of workers were made with a photometer every 15 sec and corrected to compare with an integrated concentration measurement made with a co-located IOM inhalable dust sampler. Task type and time period were recorded by the workers over an 8-hr work shift. There was a significant difference in dust concentrations between seasons (p < 0.001), with winter months providing the highest levels (geometric mean = 3.76 mg/m(3)). The application of a general linear model of log-transformed task concentrations relative to site, season, and task demonstrated significant differences (P < 0.001) among all three covariates. Tasks performed near moving animals, especially the weaning process, resulted in the greatest concentrations. These results indicate the need to evaluate the concentration levels for separate tasks during multi-task work shifts, such as swine rearing, to optimize efforts to minimize exposures by focusing on high-concentration tasks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Inhalable concentrations measured for each subject separated by three seasons and two sites. Error bars indicate the 10% and 90% percentile values of the lognormally distributed concentration values for each sample set.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Time sequence of concentration readings for the highest case in the summer (a), and the highest case in the winter (b), showing tasks related to readings.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Endotoxin concentrations (EU/m3) from personal samples by season and site. Error bars indicate the 10% and 90% percentile values of the lognormally distributed concentration values for each sample set.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. “Swine 2000, Part IV: Changes in the U.S. Pork Industry, 1990–2000.” [Online] Available at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/vs/ceah/ncahs/nahms/ swine/swine2000/swine2kPt... (Accessed March 13, 2009).
    1. Von Essen S, and Donham K: Illness and injury in animal confinement workers. Occup. Med 14(2):337–350 (1999). - PubMed
    1. Donham KJ, Popendorf W, Palmgren U, and Larsson L: Characterization of dusts collected from swine confinement buildings. Am. J. Ind. Med 10:294–297 (1986). - PubMed
    1. Donham KJ, Yeggy J, and Dague R: Production rates of toxic gases from liquid swine manure: Health implication for workers and animals in swine confinement buildings. Biological Wastes 24:161–173 (1988).
    1. Donham KJ, and Popendorf WJ: Ambient levels of selected gases inside swine confinement buildings. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J 46:658–661 (1985). - PubMed

Publication types