Evaluation of modernisation of adult critical care services in England: time series and cost effectiveness analysis
- PMID: 19906740
- PMCID: PMC2776132
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b4353
Evaluation of modernisation of adult critical care services in England: time series and cost effectiveness analysis
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact and cost effectiveness of a programme to transform adult critical care throughout England initiated in late 2000.
Design: Evaluation of trends in inputs, processes, and outcomes during 1998-2000 compared with last quarter of 2000-6.
Setting: 96 critical care units in England.
Participants: 349,817 admissions to critical care units.
Interventions: Adoption of key elements of modernisation and increases in capacity. Units were categorised according to when they adopted key elements of modernisation and increases in capacity.
Main outcome measures: Trends in inputs (beds, costs), processes (transfers between units, discharge practices, length of stay, readmissions), and outcomes (unit and hospital mortality), with adjustment for case mix. Differences in annual costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) adjusted for case mix were used to calculate net monetary benefits (valuing a QALY gain at pound20,000 ($33,170, euro22 100)). The incremental net monetary benefits were reported as the difference in net monetary benefits after versus before 2000.
Results: In the six years after 2000, the risk of unit mortality adjusted for case mix fell by 11.3% and hospital mortality by 13.4% compared with the steady state in the three preceding years. This was accompanied by substantial reductions both in transfers between units and in unplanned night discharges. The mean annual net monetary benefit increased significantly after 2000 (from pound402 ($667, euro445) to pound1096 ($1810, euro1210)), indicating that the changes were relatively cost effective. The relative contribution of the different initiatives to these improvements is unclear.
Conclusion: Substantial improvements in NHS critical care have occurred in England since 2000. While it is unclear which factors were responsible, collectively the interventions represented a highly cost effective use of NHS resources.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Risk Adjustment In Neurocritical care (RAIN)--prospective validation of risk prediction models for adult patients with acute traumatic brain injury to use to evaluate the optimum location and comparative costs of neurocritical care: a cohort study.Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jun;17(23):vii-viii, 1-350. doi: 10.3310/hta17230. Health Technol Assess. 2013. PMID: 23763763 Free PMC article.
-
Heparin versus citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in intensive care: the RRAM observational study.Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(13):1-58. doi: 10.3310/ZXHI9396. Health Technol Assess. 2022. PMID: 35212260 Free PMC article.
-
Group cognitive-behavioural programme to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis fatigue: the RAFT RCT with economic and qualitative evaluations.Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(57):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta23570. Health Technol Assess. 2019. PMID: 31601357 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ceftazidime with avibactam for treating severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections: technology evaluation to inform a novel subscription-style payment model.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(73):1-230. doi: 10.3310/YAPL9347. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 39487661 Free PMC article.
-
Cefiderocol for treating severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections: technology evaluation to inform a novel subscription-style payment model.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;28(28):1-238. doi: 10.3310/YGWR4511. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 38938145 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Is there a Starling curve for intensive care?Chest. 2012 Jun;141(6):1393-1399. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2819. Chest. 2012. PMID: 22670019 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating service development in critical care: The impact of establishing a medical high dependency unit on intensive care unit workload, case mix, and mortality.J Intensive Care Soc. 2018 Aug;19(3):226-235. doi: 10.1177/1751143718755014. Epub 2018 Feb 28. J Intensive Care Soc. 2018. PMID: 30159015 Free PMC article.
-
Night thoughts.Intensive Care Med. 2014 Oct;40(10):1586-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3467-5. Epub 2014 Sep 3. Intensive Care Med. 2014. PMID: 25183573 No abstract available.
-
Trends in short-term and 1-year mortality in very elderly intensive care patients in the Netherlands: a retrospective study from 2008 to 2014.Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;43(10):1476-1484. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4879-9. Epub 2017 Jul 13. Intensive Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28707185
-
Health Economic Evaluations in Intensive Care: An Updated Systematic Review.Crit Care Explor. 2025 Jul 16;7(7):e1288. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001288. eCollection 2025 Jul 1. Crit Care Explor. 2025. PMID: 40673428 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Department of Health. Comprehensive critical care: a review of adult critical care services. DH, 2000.
-
- Department of Health. The NHS plan. DH, 2000.
-
- NHS Modernisation Agency. 10 high impact changes for service improvement and delivery: a guide for NHS leaders. NHS Modernisation Agency, 2004.
-
- Resar R, Pronovost P, Haraden C, Simmonds T, Rainey T, Nolan T. Using a bundle approach to improve ventilator care processes and reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005;31:243-8. - PubMed
-
- Robson W. The saving lives and 100,000 lives programmes: good news for critical care nurses. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2006;22:1-3. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical