Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Nov;89(7):622-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01766.x. Epub 2009 Nov 11.

Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR study): multiple-event analysis of risk factors for reoperations. SPR Study report no. 4

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR study): multiple-event analysis of risk factors for reoperations. SPR Study report no. 4

Nicole Heussen et al. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: To identify risk factors that may lead to reoperations following primary vitrectomy (PV) and scleral buckling surgery (SB) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods: Analysis of the association between distinct parameters and the necessity for reoperations in the 'Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study' (SPR Study) using an Andersen-Gill-mean intensity model.

Results: The risk for recurrent reoperations is significantly reduced by primary vitrectomy (PV) compared to scleral buckling (SB) in pseudophakic eyes (p = 0.0009) and increased after PV compared to SB in phakic eyes (p < 0.0001). Additional significant risk factors were in the pseudophakic group preoperative deterioration of visual acuity (p = 0.0226), YAG capsulotomy (p = 0.0043), large breaks (p = 0.0290), number of affected quadrants (p = 0.0387), retinal incarceration during surgery (p = 0.0115), number of breaks (p < 0.0001) and symptomatic visual field defect (p = 0.0463). In the phakic group, associated risk factors were low intraocular pressure (p = 0.0013) and persistent intraoperative detachment at the buckle (p = 0.0184).

Conclusion: Reoperations are used as an indicator for the quality and efficacy of surgical techniques. Using a refined multivariate survival model, distinct factors were identified and associated with one or more reoperations after PV or SB in RRD surgery. This information should be useful in the decision process regarding the surgical approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources