Resident evaluation of orthodontic programs in the United States
- PMID: 19910478
Resident evaluation of orthodontic programs in the United States
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the satisfaction of orthodontic residents in the United States with their programs and determine the scope of their training. Program chairs/directors of all sixty-five U.S. orthodontic graduate programs were contacted for permission to email their residents. A total of 335 residents from thirty-seven programs were invited to complete an anonymous, online, fifty-seven-item survey in May 2007. Data were categorized, and basic statistics were performed. A total of 136 (40.60 percent) residents completed the survey. Overall, 75.74 percent were satisfied with their program. Residents said they feel they receive appropriate didactic teaching sessions and dedicated academic time (60.29 percent). Most residents (92.70 percent) indicated their program offers training in numerous philosophies, while 80.29 percent said they have sufficient clinically based training and 59.85 percent said they have sufficient research-based training. A total of 57.66 percent said they will not complete more than thirty cases from start to finish and on average treat two orthognathic surgery, thirteen extraction, twenty-four nonextraction, and nine adult patients. Most (92.70 percent) said their program contains care for disabled or underserved patients; most (92.70 percent) said they feel they will be adequately prepared to provide unsupervised orthodontic care after graduation; and 54.41 percent said they think other specialties have a positive view of orthodontics. Only 58.09 percent indicated they have a formal interdisciplinary program for treating patients. We conclude that U.S. orthodontic residents are satisfied with their programs. They receive training in a variety of approaches; however, inadequacies in exposure to interdisciplinary teaching and a limitation of the number of cases started and completed were identified. These observations may be a result of program length due to the preponderance of twenty-four- to thirty-month programs.
Similar articles
-
Resident evaluation of orthodontic programs in Canada.J Dent Educ. 2009 Feb;73(2):192-8. J Dent Educ. 2009. PMID: 19234075
-
Motivational factors and future life plans of orthodontic residents in the United States.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 May;137(5):623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.034. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010. PMID: 20451781
-
Motivations and future plans of Canadian orthodontic residents.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Nov;136(5):644-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.037. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009. PMID: 19892279
-
Pasteur's Quadrant: preparing training programs for "use-inspired" surgical research.J Surg Educ. 2008 Jul-Aug;65(4):283-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.04.003. J Surg Educ. 2008. PMID: 18707661 Review.
-
Nephrology training programs and applicants: a very good match.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jan;4(1):242-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04280808. Epub 2008 Dec 3. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009. PMID: 19056616 Review.
Cited by
-
What I wish I'd learned as an orthodontic trainee: an online survey of British Orthodontic Society members concerning postgraduate training experiences.J Orthod. 2020 Jun;47(2):116-128. doi: 10.1177/1465312520904367. Epub 2020 Feb 13. J Orthod. 2020. PMID: 32052682 Free PMC article.
-
Orthodontic Educational Landscape in the Contemporary Context: Insights from Educators.Semin Orthod. 2024 Sep;30(4):369-378. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 May 19. Semin Orthod. 2024. PMID: 40667479 Free PMC article.
-
Development and implementation of the Clinical Tooth Shade Differentiation Course--an evaluation over 3 years.GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Feb 15;33(1):Doc2. doi: 10.3205/zma001001. eCollection 2016. GMS J Med Educ. 2016. PMID: 26958650 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical