Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov 15:9:10.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6815-9-10.

Pretreatment organ function in patients with advanced head and neck cancer: clinical outcome measures and patients' views

Affiliations

Pretreatment organ function in patients with advanced head and neck cancer: clinical outcome measures and patients' views

Lisette van der Molen et al. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Aim of this study is to thoroughly assess pretreatment organ function in advanced head and neck cancer through various clinical outcome measures and patients' views.

Methods: A comprehensive, multidimensional assessment was used, that included quality of life, swallowing, mouth opening, and weight changes. Fifty-five patients with stage III-IV disease were entered in this study prior to organ preserving (chemoradiation) treatment.

Results: All patients showed pretreatment abnormalities or problems, identified by one or more of the outcome measures. Most frequent problems concerned swallowing, pain, and weight loss. Interestingly, clinical outcome measures and patients' perception did no always concur. E.g. videofluoroscopy identified aspiration and laryngeal penetration in 18% of the patients, whereas only 7 patients (13%) perceived this as problematic; only 2 out of 7 patients with objective trismus actually perceived trismus.

Conclusion: The assessment identified several problems already pre-treatment, in this patient population. A thorough assessment of both clinical measures and patients' views appears to be necessary to gain insight in all (perceived) pre-existing functional and quality of life problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of frequencies of problems detected by the multidimensional assessment from Table 4.

References

    1. Chen AY, Halpern M. Factors predictive of survival in advanced laryngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133:1270–1276. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.12.1270. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoffman HT, Porter K, Karnell LH, Cooper JS, Weber RS, Langer CJ. et al.Laryngeal cancer in the United States: changes in demographics, patterns of care, and survival. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1–13. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000236095.97947.26. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pignon JP, Le Maitre A, Bourhis J. Meta-Analyses of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC): an update. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:S112–S114. - PubMed
    1. Molen L van der, van Rossum MA, Burkhead LM, Smeele LE, Hilgers FJ. Functional outcomes and rehabilitation strategies in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266:901–902. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0845-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, Logemann JA, Stein D, Beery Q, Newman L. et al.Pretreatment swallowing function in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2000;22:474–482. doi: 10.1002/1097-0347(200008)22:5<474::AID-HED6>3.0.CO;2-I. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources