Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;80(2):266-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.038. Epub 2009 Nov 13.

E-mail in patient-provider communication: a systematic review

Jiali Ye  1 , George Rust, Yvonne Fry-Johnson, Harry Strothers
Affiliations

E-mail in patient-provider communication: a systematic review

Jiali Ye et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To review systematically the role of e-mails in patient-provider communication in terms of e-mail content, and perspectives of providers and patients on e-mail communication in health care.

Methods: A systematic review of studies on e-mail communication between patients and health providers in regular health care published from 2000 to 2008.

Results: A total of 24 studies were included in the review. Among these studies, 21 studies examined e-mail communication between patients and providers, and three studies examined the e-mail communication between parents of patients in pediatric primary care and pediatricians. In the content analyses of e-mail messages, topics well represented were medical information exchange, medical condition or update, medication information, and subspecialty evaluation. A number of personal and institutional features were associated with the likelihood of e-mail use between patients and providers. While benefits of e-mails in enhancing communication were recognized by both patients and providers, concerns about confidentiality and security were also expressed.

Conclusion: The e-mail is transforming the relationship between patients and providers. The rigorous exploration of pros and cons of electronic interaction in health care settings will help make e-mail communication a more powerful, mutually beneficial health care provision tool.

Practice implications: It is important to develop an electronic communication system for the clinical practice that can address a range of concerns. More efforts need to be made to educate patients and providers to appropriately and effectively use e-mail for communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of included and excluded studies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Stewart MA. Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ-Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152:1423–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician–patient communication: the relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. J Am Med Assoc. 1997;277:553–9. - PubMed
    1. Ruiz-Moral R, Pérez Rodríguez E, Pérula de Torres LA, de la Torre J. Physician–patient communication: a study on the observed behaviours of specialty physicians and the way their patients perceive them. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64:242–8. - PubMed
    1. Zandbelt LC, Smets EM, Oort FJ, Godfried MH, de Haes HC. Patient participation in the medical specialist encounter: does physicians’ patient-centered communication matter? Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65:396–406. - PubMed
    1. Dutta-Bergman MJ. The relation between health-orientation, provider–patient communication, and satisfaction: an individual-difference approach. Health Commun. 2005;8:291–303. - PubMed

Publication types