The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Stage T4 designation is not warranted
- PMID: 19914651
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.138
The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Stage T4 designation is not warranted
Abstract
Purpose: The American Joint Committee on Cancer currently designates invasion of the bladder neck as a pT4 lesion. However, retrospective analyses have not demonstrated biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy to be consistent with other T4 lesions. We examined biochemical recurrence-free survival and cancer specific survival in men with a positive bladder neck margin.
Materials and methods: Of nearly 17,000 patients in the Johns Hopkins Institutional radical prostatectomy database (1982 to 2008) 198 (1.2%) were identified with a positive bladder neck margin. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to evaluate biochemical recurrence-free survival and cancer specific survival. A multivariate proportional hazards model predicting biochemical recurrence-free survival and cancer specific survival was fit with prostate specific antigen, Gleason sum and pathological stage to determine the significance of a positive bladder neck margin.
Results: Of the 198 men with a positive bladder neck margin 79 had an isolated bladder neck margin without seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement. The 12-year biochemical recurrence-free survival of men with organ confined disease, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement without a positive bladder neck margin was 91.1%, 61.1%, 24.5% and 8.1%, respectively. For men with a positive bladder neck margin and those with an isolated positive bladder neck margin biochemical recurrence-free survival was 16.8% and 37.1%, respectively. The 12-year cancer specific survival for men with organ confined disease, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement without a positive bladder neck margin was 93.5%, 89.0%, 77.0% and 66.8%, respectively. For men with a positive bladder neck margin and those with an isolated positive bladder neck margin cancer specific survival was 78.2% and 92.5%, respectively. A positive bladder neck margin was not a significant predictor of outcome (p = 0.4) on multivariable analysis.
Conclusions: The incidence of an isolated positive bladder neck margin is low. Men with an isolated positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy experienced a 12-year biochemical recurrence-free survival of 37% and cancer specific survival of 92%, similar to patients with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) and extraprostatic extension (pT3a), respectively. The existing American Joint Committee on Cancer classification for prostate cancer should be reconsidered.
Comment in
-
Editorial comment.J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):157. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.202. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 19914653 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database.J Urol. 2008 Jan;179(1):124-9; discussion 129. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.130. Epub 2007 Nov 12. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 17997433
-
Evaluation of the 7th American Joint Committee on cancer TNM staging system for prostate cancer in point of classification of bladder neck invasion.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb;43(2):184-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys196. Epub 2012 Dec 5. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23225909
-
Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor.J Urol. 2002 Nov;168(5):2011-5. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64284-X. J Urol. 2002. PMID: 12394697
-
Histopathologic outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy.ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Jun 2;6:2566-72. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.397. ScientificWorldJournal. 2006. PMID: 17619732 Free PMC article. Review.
-
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease.Mod Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):26-38. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.158. Epub 2010 Aug 27. Mod Pathol. 2011. PMID: 20802467 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of positive surgical margin location after radical prostatectomy: a network meta-analysis.World J Urol. 2025 Feb 22;43(1):134. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05479-7. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 39985570 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparing CTVs for permanent prostate brachytherapy.Clin Transl Oncol. 2015 May;17(5):393-7. doi: 10.1007/s12094-014-1245-z. Epub 2014 Oct 29. Clin Transl Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25351173
-
African-american race is a predictor of seminal vesicle invasion after radical prostatectomy.Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015 Apr;13(2):e65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Oct 25. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25450037 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic factors for failure after prostatectomy.J Cancer. 2010 Dec 7;2:1-19. J Cancer. 2010. PMID: 21197260 Free PMC article.
-
Significance and management of positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomy.Indian J Urol. 2014 Oct;30(4):423-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.134240. Indian J Urol. 2014. PMID: 25378825 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical