Editorial comment

Editorial

Cristina Magi-Galluzzi. J Urol. 2010 Jan.

. 2010 Jan;183(1):157.

doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.202.

No abstract available

Comment on

The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Stage T4 designation is not warranted.
Pierorazio PM, Epstein JI, Humphreys E, Han M, Walsh PC, Partin AW. Pierorazio PM, et al. J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.138. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 19914651

Editorial comment on: Prevalence of a tertiary Gleason grade and its impact on adverse histopathologic parameters in a contemporary radical prostatectomy series.
Egevad L. Egevad L. Eur Urol. 2009 Feb;55(2):403. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.018. Epub 2008 Aug 13. Eur Urol. 2009. PMID: 18718704 No abstract available.
Editorial comment.
Carter HB. Carter HB. Urology. 2009 Sep;74(3):658; author reply 659. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.069. Urology. 2009. PMID: 19716923 No abstract available.
Editorial comment on: Prostate-specific antigen improves the ability of clinical stage and biopsy gleason sum to predict the pathologic stage at radical prostatectomy in the new millennium.
Stenman UH. Stenman UH. Eur Urol. 2007 Oct;52(4):1074-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.019. Eur Urol. 2007. PMID: 17383813 No abstract available.
Radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine treatment: a review.
Bosch R, Schröder FH. Bosch R, et al. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;359:239-47; discussion 249-50. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990. PMID: 2284295 Review. No abstract available.
Radical prostatectomy in locally confined prostatic carcinoma.
Walsh PC. Walsh PC. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;359:199-207; discussion 223-9. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990. PMID: 2284292 Review.