Twenty-seven years of phase III trials for patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: disappointing results
- PMID: 19915681
 - PMCID: PMC2773043
 - DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007835
 
Twenty-seven years of phase III trials for patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: disappointing results
Abstract
Background: Few studies have formally assessed whether treatment outcomes have improved substantially over the years for patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) enrolled in phase III trials. The objective of the current investigation was to determine the time trends in outcomes for the patients in those trials.
Methods and findings: We searched for trials that were reported between January 1981 and August 2008. Phase III randomized controlled trials were eligible if they compared first-line, systemic chemotherapy for ED-SCLC. Data were evaluated by using a linear regression analysis.
Results: In total, 52 trials were identified that had been initiated between 1980 and 2006; these studies involved 10,262 patients with 110 chemotherapy arms. The number of randomized patients and the proportion of patients with good performance status (PS) increased over time. Cisplatin-based regimens, especially cisplatin and etoposide (PE) regimen, have increasingly been studied, whereas cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine-based regimens have been less investigated. Multiple regression analysis showed no significant improvement in survival over the years. Additionally, the use of a PE regimen did not affect survival, whereas the proportion of patients with good PS and the trial design of assigning prophylactic cranial irradiation were significantly associated with favorable outcome.
Conclusions and significance: The survival of patients with ED-SCLC enrolled in phase III trials did not improve significantly over the years, suggesting the need for further development of novel targets, newer agents, and comprehensive patient care.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
              
              
              
              
                
                
                
              
              
              
              
                
                
                
              
              
              
              
                
                
                References
- 
    
- Smyth JF. Chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer. Chest. 1989;96:61S–62S. - PubMed
 
 - 
    
- Roth BJ, Johnson DH, Einhorn LH, Schacter LP, Cherng NC, et al. Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:282–291. - PubMed
 
 - 
    
- Chute JP, Chen T, Feigal E, Simon R, Johnson BE. Twenty years of phase III trials for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: perceptible progress. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1794–1801. - PubMed
 
 - 
    
- Stahel RA. Staging and prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: a consensus report. Lung Cancer. 1989;5
 
 - 
    
- Zelen M. Keynote address on biostatistics and data retrieval. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1973;4:31–42. - PubMed
 
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
