Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;28(6):675-81.
doi: 10.1037/a0016395.

Opt-out testing for stigmatized diseases: a social psychological approach to understanding the potential effect of recommendations for routine HIV testing

Sean D Young  1 , Benoit Monin, Douglas Owens
Affiliations

Opt-out testing for stigmatized diseases: a social psychological approach to understanding the potential effect of recommendations for routine HIV testing

Sean D Young et al. Health Psychol. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: Little research has studied experimentally whether an opt-out policy will increase testing rates or whether this strategy is especially effective in the case of stigmatized diseases such as HIV.

Design and main outcome measures: In Study 1, a 2 x 2 factorial design asked participants to make moral judgments about a person's decision to test for stigmatized diseases under an opt-in versus an opt-out policy. In Study 2, a 2 x 2 factorial design measuring testing rates explored whether opt-out methods reduce stigma and increase testing for stigmatized diseases.

Results: Study 1 results suggest that getting tested draws suspicion regarding moral conduct in an opt-in system, whereas not getting tested draws suspicion in an opt-out system. Study 2 results suggest that an opt-out policy may increase testing rates for stigmatized diseases and lessen the effects of stigma in people's reluctance to test.

Discussion: A social psychological approach to health services can be used to show how testing policies can influence both the stigmatization associated with testing and participation rates. An understanding of how testing policies may affect patient decision making and behavior is imperative for creating effective testing policies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Judgments of morality by testing paradigm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Likelihood of testing by type of disease and testing paradigm.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson J, Hardy A, Cahill K, Aral S. HIV antibody testing and posttest counseling in the United States. American Journal of Public Health. 1992;82:1533–1535. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berrios D, Hearst N, Coates T, Stall R, Hudes E, Turner H, et al. HIV antibody testing among those at risk for HIV infection: The National AIDS Behavior Survey (NABC) JAMA. 1993 October 6;270:1576–1580. - PubMed
    1. Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, Janssen RS, Taylor AW, Lyss SB, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;22:1–17. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Technical guidance on HIV counseling. MMWR. 1993. pp. 11–16. Accessed September 2007, from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00020645.htm. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV counseling and testing in publicly funded sites. 1996. Retrieved September 2007 from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/cts96.pdf.