Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Nov 17:10:72.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-72.

Effectiveness of IT-based diabetes management interventions: a review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Effectiveness of IT-based diabetes management interventions: a review of the literature

Beth M Costa et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Information technology (IT) is increasingly being used in general practice to manage health care including type 2 diabetes. However, there is conflicting evidence about whether IT improves diabetes outcomes. This review of the literature about IT-based diabetes management interventions explores whether methodological issues such as sample characteristics, outcome measures, and mechanisms causing change in the outcome measures could explain some of the inconsistent findings evident in IT-based diabetes management studies.

Methods: Databases were searched using terms related to IT and diabetes management. Articles eligible for review evaluated an IT-based diabetes management intervention in general practice and were published between 1999 and 2009 inclusive in English. Studies that did not include outcome measures were excluded.

Results: Four hundred and twenty-five articles were identified, sixteen met the inclusion criteria: eleven GP focussed and five patient focused interventions were evaluated. Nine were RCTs, five non-randomised control trials, and two single-sample before and after designs. Important sample characteristics such as diabetes type, familiarity with IT, and baseline diabetes knowledge were not addressed in any of the studies reviewed. All studies used HbA1c as a primary outcome measure, and nine reported a significant improvement in mean HbA1c over the study period; only two studies reported the HbA1c assay method. Five studies measured diabetes medications and two measured psychological outcomes. Patient lifestyle variables were not included in any of the studies reviewed. IT was the intervention method considered to effect changes in the outcome measures. Only two studies mentioned alternative possible causal mechanisms.

Conclusion: Several limitations could affect the outcomes of IT-based diabetes management interventions to an unknown degree. These limitations make it difficult to attribute changes solely to such interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Piette JD. Interactive behaviour change technology to support diabetes self-management: where do we stand? Diabetes Care. 2007;30(2425-32) - PubMed
    1. Joshy G, Simmons D. Diabetes information systems: a rapidly emerging support for diabetes surveillance and care. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2006;8:587–597. doi: 10.1089/dia.2006.8.587. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nobel J. Bridging the knowledge-action gap in diabetes: information technologies, physician incentives and consumer incentives converge. Chronic Illn. 2005;2:59–69. - PubMed
    1. Department of Human Services. Diabetes prevention and management: a strategic framework for Victoria 2007-2010. Melbourne: Victorian DOH; 2007.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Diabetes: Australian facts 2008 Diabetes series no. 8 Cat. No. CVD 40 edition. Canberra: AIHW; 2008.

MeSH terms

Substances