Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov 18;97(10):2839-45.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.044.

A self-consistent description of the conformational behavior of chemically denatured proteins from NMR and small angle scattering

Affiliations

A self-consistent description of the conformational behavior of chemically denatured proteins from NMR and small angle scattering

Pau Bernadó et al. Biophys J. .

Abstract

Characterization of the conformational properties of unfolded proteins is essential for understanding the mechanisms of protein folding and misfolding. This information is also fundamental to determining the relationship between flexibility and function in the highly diverse families of intrinsically disordered proteins. Here we present a self-consistent model of conformational sampling of chemically denatured proteins in agreement with experimental data reporting on long-range distance distributions in unfolded proteins using small-angle x-ray scattering and nuclear magnetic resonance pulse-field gradient-based measurements. We find that standard statistical coil models, selected from folded protein databases with secondary structural elements removed, need to be refined to correct backbone dihedral angle sampling of denatured proteins, although they appear to be appropriate for intrinsically disordered proteins. For denatured proteins, pervasive increases in the sampling of more-extended regions of Ramachandran space {50 degrees <psi < 180 degrees} throughout the peptide chain are found to be consistent with all experimental data. These observations are in agreement with previous conclusions derived from short-range nuclear magnetic resonance data from residual dipolar couplings, leading the way to a self-consistent description of denatured chains that is in agreement with short- and long-range data measured using both spectroscopic and scattering techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation between experimental and theoretical values of (a) radius of gyration Rg, and (b) hydrodynamic radius Rh for the ensembles corresponding to the standard database. Dashed line represents slope equal to 1.0. Experimental values of Rg were obtained from Kohn et al. (11), and Rh values were obtained from Wilkins et al. (47) and Pan et al. (48).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Optimal percentage of extended conformations. Agreement of the overall parameters (a) Rg and (b) Rh upon increasing the percentage of extended conformations in the database. Correlation between the experimental and theoretical (c) Rg and (d) Rh at the optimal database found, X = 2.0, which corresponds to a 74.2% of extended conformations. Dashed line again represents slope equal to 1.0.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Reproduction of experimental residual dipolar couplings measured from urea unfolded ubiquitin at pH2 aligned in polyacrylamide gel using databases sampling different levels of extension. The χ2 is measured over seven types of coupling: 1DNH, 1DCαHα, 1DCαC′, DHNHα (i,i-1), DHNHN (i,i+1), DHNHN(i,i+2), and DHNHα. Data taken from Meier et al. (25).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationship of the Rg (a) and Rh (b) values calculated using the standard database with the length of the protein chain N. From this correlation, the parameters of Flory's relationship (Eq. 1) were derived for both observables. From Rg, ν = 0.522 ± 0.01 and R0 = 2.54 ± 0.01; and from Rh, ν = 0.449 ± 0.01 and R0 = 3.53 ± 0.01. (c) Rg values compiled for protein τ (solid circles) and other IDPs (open circles), compared with the threshold values according to the calibration found in panel a (solid line). See the Supporting Material for the list of IDPs used in this plot.

References

    1. Tompa P. Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002;27:527–533. - PubMed
    1. Uversky V.N. Natively unfolded proteins: a point where biology waits for physics. Protein Sci. 2002;11:739–756. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fink A.L. Natively unfolded proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2005;15:35–41. - PubMed
    1. Dyson H.J., Wright P.E. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Chem. Rev. 2004;104:3607–3622. - PubMed
    1. Fuxreiter M., Simon I., Friedrich P., Tompa P. Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2004;338:1015–1026. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources