Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer
- PMID: 19917860
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2180
Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer
Abstract
PURPOSE We assessed the outcome of a watchful-waiting protocol with selective delayed intervention by using clinical prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or histologic progression as treatment indications for clinically localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a prospective, single-arm, cohort study. Patients were managed with an initial expectant approach. Definitive intervention was offered to those patients with a PSA doubling time of less than 3 years, Gleason score progression (to 4 + 3 or greater), or unequivocal clinical progression. Survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model were applied to the data. Results A total of 450 patients have been observed with active surveillance. Median follow-up was 6.8 years (range, 1 to 13 years). Overall survival was 78.6%. The 10-year prostate cancer actuarial survival was 97.2%. Overall, 30% of patients have been reclassified as higher risk and have been offered definitive therapy. Of 117 patients treated radically, the PSA failure rate was 50%, which was 13% of the total cohort. PSA doubling time of 3 years or less was associated with an 8.5-times higher risk of biochemical failure after definitive treatment compared with a doubling time of more than 3 years (P < .0001). The hazard ratio for nonprostate cancer to prostate cancer mortality was 18.6 at 10 years. CONCLUSION We observed a low rate of prostate cancer mortality. Among the patients who were reclassified as higher risk and who were treated, PSA failure was relatively common. Other-cause mortality accounted for almost all of the deaths. Additional studies are warranted to improve the identification of patients who harbor more aggressive disease despite favorable clinical parameters at diagnosis.
Comment in
-
Active surveillance in young patients with prostate cancer: the unanswered question.J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 1;28(13):e211; author reply e212. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.3383. Epub 2010 Apr 5. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20368544 No abstract available.
-
Active surveillance for prostate cancer: has the time finally come?J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 1;28(16):e265-6; author reply e267. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.1584. Epub 2010 Apr 20. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20406916 No abstract available.
-
Active surveillance: is there a need for better risk stratification at the outset?J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 1;28(28):e513; author reply e514. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3316. Epub 2010 Aug 9. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20697073 No abstract available.
-
Words of wisdom. Re: clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.Eur Urol. 2010 Jul;58(1):179-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.015. Eur Urol. 2010. PMID: 20825750 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous