Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device
- PMID: 19920051
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909938
Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device
Erratum in
-
Advanced Heart Failure Treated with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device; Intrapericardial Left Ventricular Assist Device for Advanced Heart Failure; Increase in Left Ventricular Assist Device Thrombosis.N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 16;379(7):697. doi: 10.1056/NEJMx180029. N Engl J Med. 2018. PMID: 30124260 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Patients with advanced heart failure have improved survival rates and quality of life when treated with implanted pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices as compared with medical therapy. New continuous-flow devices are smaller and may be more durable than the pulsatile-flow devices.
Methods: In this randomized trial, we enrolled patients with advanced heart failure who were ineligible for transplantation, in a 2:1 ratio, to undergo implantation of a continuous-flow device (134 patients) or the currently approved pulsatile-flow device (66 patients). The primary composite end point was, at 2 years, survival free from disabling stroke and reoperation to repair or replace the device. Secondary end points included survival, frequency of adverse events, the quality of life, and functional capacity.
Results: Preoperative characteristics were similar in the two treatment groups, with a median age of 64 years (range, 26 to 81), a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 17%, and nearly 80% of patients receiving intravenous inotropic agents. The primary composite end point was achieved in more patients with continuous-flow devices than with pulsatile-flow devices (62 of 134 [46%] vs. 7 of 66 [11%]; P<0.001; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 0.54; P<0.001), and patients with continuous-flow devices had superior actuarial survival rates at 2 years (58% vs. 24%, P=0.008). Adverse events and device replacements were less frequent in patients with the continuous-flow device. The quality of life and functional capacity improved significantly in both groups.
Conclusions: Treatment with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in patients with advanced heart failure significantly improved the probability of survival free from stroke and device failure at 2 years as compared with a pulsatile device. Both devices significantly improved the quality of life and functional capacity. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00121485.)
2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
Rise of the machines--left ventricular assist devices as permanent therapy for advanced heart failure.N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 3;361(23):2282-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0910394. Epub 2009 Nov 17. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19920052 No abstract available.
-
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 25;362(12):1149; author reply 1149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0912930. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20335596 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Intrapericardial Left Ventricular Assist Device for Advanced Heart Failure.N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 2;376(5):451-460. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602954. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 28146651 Clinical Trial.
-
A Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device - Final Report.N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 25;380(17):1618-1627. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1900486. Epub 2019 Mar 17. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 30883052 Clinical Trial.
-
A Fully Magnetically Levitated Circulatory Pump for Advanced Heart Failure.N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 2;376(5):440-450. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610426. Epub 2016 Nov 16. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 27959709 Clinical Trial.
-
Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Destination Therapy: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Feb 8;16(3):1-60. eCollection 2016. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016. PMID: 27026798 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolution of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy for Advanced Heart Failure: A Review.JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):650-658. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0522. JAMA Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29710092 Review.
Cited by
-
Computational fluid dynamics-based study of possibility of generating pulsatile blood flow via a continuous-flow VAD.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017 Jan;55(1):167-178. doi: 10.1007/s11517-016-1523-8. Epub 2016 May 27. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017. PMID: 27234039
-
Clinicians' attitudes regarding withdrawal of left ventricular assist devices in patients approaching the end of life.Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Nov;15(11):1262-6. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft094. Epub 2013 Jun 5. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013. PMID: 23744792 Free PMC article.
-
Why pulsatility still matters: a review of current knowledge.Croat Med J. 2014 Dec;55(6):609-20. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2014.55.609. Croat Med J. 2014. PMID: 25559832 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Wideband arrhythmia-Insensitive-rapid (AIR) pulse sequence for cardiac T1 mapping without image artifacts induced by an implantable-cardioverter-defibrillator.Magn Reson Med. 2015 Aug;74(2):336-45. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25712. Epub 2015 May 14. Magn Reson Med. 2015. PMID: 25975192 Free PMC article.
-
Left ventricular assist devices: a kidney's perspective.Heart Fail Rev. 2015 Jul;20(4):519-32. doi: 10.1007/s10741-015-9481-z. Heart Fail Rev. 2015. PMID: 25796403 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical