Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2010 Jan;71(1):53-63.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.08.027. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

In vivo characterization of pancreatic and lymph node tissue by using EUS spectrum analysis: a validation study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

In vivo characterization of pancreatic and lymph node tissue by using EUS spectrum analysis: a validation study

Ronald E Kumon et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Quantitative spectral analysis of the radiofrequency (RF) signals that underlie grayscale EUS images can be used to provide additional, objective information about tissue state.

Objective: Our purpose was to validate RF spectral analysis as a method to distinguish between (1) benign and malignant lymph nodes and (2) normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer.

Design and setting: A prospective validation study of eligible patients was conducted to compare with pilot study RF data.

Patients: Forty-three patients underwent EUS of the esophagus, stomach, pancreas, and surrounding intra-abdominal and mediastinal lymph nodes (19 from a previous pilot study and 24 additional patients).

Main outcome measurements: Midband fit, slope, intercept, and correlation coefficient from a linear regression of the calibrated RF power spectra were determined.

Results: Discriminant analysis of mean pilot-study parameters was then performed to classify validation-study parameters. For benign versus malignant lymph nodes, midband fit and intercept (both with t test P < .058) provided classification with 67% accuracy and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.86. For diseased versus normal pancreas, midband fit and correlation coefficient (both with analysis of variance P < .001) provided 93% accuracy and an AUC of 0.98. For pancreatic cancer versus chronic pancreatitis, the same parameters provided 77% accuracy and an AUC of 0.89. Results improved further when classification was performed with all data.

Limitations: Moderate sample size and spatial averaging inherent to the technique.

Conclusions: This study confirms that mean spectral parameters provide a noninvasive method to quantitatively discriminate benign and malignant lymph nodes as well as normal and diseased pancreas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest disclosures: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Radio-frequency (RF) signal used for spectral calibration. A, Ultrasound pulse for the C5 mode of EUS system. B, Corresponding power spectrum. The usable bandwidth, defined by the range within −15 dB from the maximum of the spectrum, is 2 to 10.6 MHz or 8.6 MHz.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Linear discriminant analysis and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for the lymph node data. A, Scatterplot of data from Study 1 (pilot study) and Study 2 (validation study) with coordinates given by midband fit and intercept. The dividing line between benign and malignant classification is based on linear discriminant analysis of Study 1 data only (training set). B, Corresponding binormal maximum likelihood estimate of the ROC curve with discriminant scores from Study 2 only (testing set). The area the curve is 0.86. (See Table 2 for the corresponding classification matrix.)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Linear discriminant analysis and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for the pancreas data. A, Scatterplot of data from Study 1 (pilot study) and Study 2 (validation study) with coordinates given by midband fit and correlation coefficient R2. The dividing lines for the classification of normal pancreas (NP) vs diseased pancreas (PC and CP together) [solid] and pancreatic cancer (PC) vs. chronic pancreatitis (CP) excluding NP [dashed] are based on linear discriminant analysis of Study 1 data only (training set). The legend indicates which tissue state and study number corresponds to each point. B, Corresponding binormal maximum likelihood estimates of the ROC curves for each classification with discriminant scores from Study 2 only (testing set). The area under each curve is given in the legend. (See Tables 4 and 5 for the corresponding classification matrices.)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rifkin MD, Ehrlich SM, Marks G. Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT. Radiology. 1989;170:319–22. - PubMed
    1. Botet JF, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG, Gerdes H, Winawer SJ, Urmacher C, Brennan MF. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology. 1991;181:426–32. - PubMed
    1. Meyenberger C, Huch Boni RA, Bertschinger P, Zala GF, Klotz HP, Krestin GP. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Endoscopy. 1995;27:469–79. - PubMed
    1. Willis S, Truong S, Gribnitz S, Fass J, Schumpelick V. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer: accuracy and impact on surgical therapy. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:951–4. - PubMed
    1. van Vliet EP, Eijkemans MJ, Poley JW, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD. Staging of esophageal carcinoma in a low-volume EUS center compared with reported results from high-volume centers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:938–47. - PubMed