Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Dec 1;13(6):367-73.
doi: 10.1007/BF03256342.

Molecular classification of cancers of unknown primary site

Affiliations
Review

Molecular classification of cancers of unknown primary site

F Anthony Greco et al. Mol Diagn Ther. .

Abstract

Cancer of unknown primary site is a common metastatic cancer, diagnosed in about 50 000 patients per year in the US. The diagnosis, classification, and management of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site has been difficult and frustrating. The therapy has usually been empiric for the majority of patients, and their prognosis has been poor. Molecular classification of metastatic cancers with known primary sites has been accurate (76-89%), as reported from several studies. Molecular profiling of initial biopsy specimens has tremendous potential as a test to diagnose the site of tumor origin in patients with unknown primary cancer. Several retrospective studies of molecular profiling assays have provided indirect validation of the accuracy of primary site prediction, based on correlations with clinicopathologic features. One additional study of initial diagnostic biopsies in unknown primary cancer patients, where primary tumor sites were identified months to years later, has provided more direct validation of the accuracy of molecular classification (the primary tumor sites of 15 of 20 patients were correctly predicted). The ability to diagnose and classify unknown primary cancer more precisely would allow for more site-specific or targeted therapy, and likely improve patient outcomes. Several clinical studies are in progress or planned to test this concept.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Mol Diagn. 2006 Jul;8(3):320-9 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Dec 18;98(26):15149-54 - PubMed
    1. Semin Oncol. 2009 Feb;36(1):8-37 - PubMed
    1. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2005 Apr;9(2):77-80 - PubMed
    1. Curr Genomics. 2008 Nov;9(7):466-74 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources