Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction
- PMID: 19925377
- DOI: 10.1080/00016340903214932
Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction
Abstract
Maternal and fetal morbidity of two different methods of delivering the baby during cesarean section performed in advanced labor when the fetal head is deeply engaged was assessed retrospectively, i.e. delivering as 'cephalic' with or without assistance to push up the fetal head from the vagina (head first or push method) and 'reverse breech extraction' (feet first or pull method). Records of 182 women with a single fetus in cephalic presentation, who had undergone cesarean section at cervical dilatation at > or =7 cm, with the vertex at or below zero station, were reviewed. Extension of the uterine incision occurred in significantly more women during 'cephalic' delivery as compared to 'reverse breech extraction' (22.8% versus 2.2%; p=0.001). Use of 'reverse breech extraction' is an attractive and safe alternative to the standard methods for intra-operative disengagement of a deeply impacted fetal head in order to reduce maternal and fetal morbidity.
Comment in
-
Comment on 'Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction'.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Jun;89(6):849-50; author reply 851. doi: 10.3109/00016340903410915. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010. PMID: 19916878 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Jul 1;121(1):24-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.09.014. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005. PMID: 15961214
-
Reverse breech extraction versus head pushing in cesarean section for obstructed labor. A comparative study in Yemen.Saudi Med J. 2011 Dec;32(12):1261-6. Saudi Med J. 2011. PMID: 22159381 Clinical Trial.
-
Comment on 'Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction'.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Jun;89(6):849-50; author reply 851. doi: 10.3109/00016340903410915. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010. PMID: 19916878 No abstract available.
-
Difficult delivery of the impacted fetal head during cesarean section: intraoperative disengagement dystocia.J Perinat Med. 2004;32(6):465-9. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2004.152. J Perinat Med. 2004. PMID: 15576265 Review.
-
Breech deliveries and cesarean section.J Perinat Med. 2003;31(5):415-9. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2003.064. J Perinat Med. 2003. PMID: 14601264 Review.
Cited by
-
Management of impacted fetal head at cesarean delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S980-S987. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.037. Epub 2023 Aug 5. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38462267 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Mar 27;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2253-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 30917799 Free PMC article.
-
Techniques for assisting difficult delivery at caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 31;2016(1):CD004944. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004944.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 26827159 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical