Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 15;186(2):155-64.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

A combined method of laser capture microdissection and X-Gal histology to analyze gene expression in c-Fos-specific neurons

Affiliations

A combined method of laser capture microdissection and X-Gal histology to analyze gene expression in c-Fos-specific neurons

Bumsup Kwon et al. J Neurosci Methods. .

Abstract

c-Fos is a member of the activator protein 1 family that regulates transcription of target genes. c-Fos is transiently induced in specific regions of the brain after a variety of external stimuli including learning and memory formation. Analysis of gene expression in c-Fos-expressing cells of the brain may help identify target genes that play important roles in synaptic strength or neuronal morphology. In the present study, we developed a combined method of laser capture microdissection and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoly-beta-D-galactopyranosidase (X-Gal) histology to analyze gene expression in stimulus-induced c-Fos-positive cells. Using transgenic mice carrying a c-fos-lacZ fusion gene, c-Fos-positive cells were easily identified by measuring of beta-galactosidase (beta-Gal) activity. To establish the fidelity of the reporter transgene, the time course of endogenous c-Fos and the c-fos-lacZ transgene expression in the amygdala induced by LiCl administration was investigated by immunohistochemistry and X-Gal staining. LiCl increased the numbers of c-Fos- and beta-Gal-positive cells in the central and basolateral amygdala of the transgenic mice. To ensure that RNA was preserved in X-Gal stained tissue sections, different fixations were examined, with the conclusion that ethanol fixation was best for both RNA preservation and X-Gal staining quality. Finally, in combining X-Gal staining, single-cell LCM and RT-PCR, we confirmed mRNA expression of endogenous c-fos and beta-actin genes in LiCl-induced beta-Gal-positive cells in the CeA, cortex and hippocampus. Combining LCM and transgenic reporter genes provides a powerful tool with which to investigate tissue- or cell-specific gene expression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Photomicrographs of c-Fos immunohistochemistry (top panels) and X-Gal staining (bottom panels) in the BLA 1 and 6 h following LiCl (i.p., 0.15 M, 40 ml/kg) or 1 h following NaCl administration. Scale bar, 300 μm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Photomicrographs of c-Fos immunohistochemistry (top panels) and X-Gal staining (bottom panels) in the CeA 1 and 3 h following LiCl (i.p., 0.15 M, 40 ml/kg) or 1 h following NaCl administration. Scale bar, 300 μm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Quantification of c-Fos- and β-Gal-positive cells in the LA (A), BLA (B) and CeA (C) 1, 3, 6 and 9 h following LiCl (i.p., 0.15 M, 40 ml/kg) and 1 h following NaCl administrations. LiCl increased c-Fos-positive cells in the CeA at 1 h and BLA at 3 and 6 h. LiCl also increased β-Gal-positive cells in the CeA at 1 and 6 h and BLA and LA at 6 h. β-Gal-positive cells were lower than c-Fos-positive cells in the CeA at 1 h and BLA at 6 h. * p <0.05 vs. NaCl, † p < 0.05 vs. c-Fos. n = 4 per group. A representative coronal section of the mouse brain showing outlines within which c-Fos- and β-Gal-positive cells were quantified (D). BLA, basolateral amygdala; CeA, central amygdala; ec, external capsule; LA, lateral amygdala; opt, optic tract. Scale bar in (D), 1 mm.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Photomicrographs of β-Gal-positive (blue, A) and fluorescently-labeled c-Fos-positive (green, B) cells and a merged image (C) in the CeA 1 h after a LiCl injection. Arrows in (C) indicate β-Gal and c-Fos double-labeled cells. Scale bar, 100 μm in (A).
Figure 5
Figure 5
RT-PCR products of β-actin after different fixations. Brain sections (8 μm) were fixed with DEPC-dH2O (unfixed), 4% PFA, 70% ethanol, 95% ethanol, acetone, or methanol for 5 min at room temperature. Some brain sections fixed with 4% PFA were also treated with proteinase K overnight. After fixations, brain sections were incubated in DEPC-dH2O for 0, 3 and 20 h at room temperature. RT-PCR using β-actin primers was performed with total RNA extracted from each section scratch at the time points. β-actin mRNA was well amplified in the ethanol-, methanol- and acetone-fixed sections at all time points, indicating mRNA preservation sufficient for utilization in RT-PCR. PFA, paraformaldehyde; PK, proteinase K; EtOH, ethanol.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Total RNA isolated from brain tissue after different fixations. Brain tissue (50 mg each) was fixed with DEPC-dH2O (unfixed), 4% PFA, 70% ethanol, 95% ethanol, acetone, or methanol for 1 h on ice. Some brain tissue fixed with 4% PFA was also treated with proteinase K overnight. After fixations, brain tissue was incubated in DEPC-dH2O for 0, 3 and 20 h at room temperature. Total RNA was extracted at the time points and visualized in formaldehyde RNA gels. 5 μg per each sample except PFA and PFA-proteinase K samples (less than 0.5 μg) were loaded. Ethanol-, acetone-, methanol- and un-fixed samples showed intact RNA at 0 h, but showed partially degraded RNA at 3 and 20 h. Total RNA from PFA and PFA-proteinase K samples was scarcely visualized at all time points. PFA, paraformaldehyde; PK, proteinase K; EtOH, ethanol.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Photomicrographs of X-Gal staining after different fixations in the cortex 1 h following LiCl (0.15 M, 40 ml/kg, i.p.). PFA, paraformaldehyde; EtOH, ethanol. Scale bar, 50 μm.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Laser capture microdissection (LCM) of β-Gal-positive single cells in the CeA. An X-Gal stained and dehydrated 8 μm brain section of a LiCl-treated transgenic mouse is shown before (A) and after (B) microdissection of β-Gal-positive single cells in the CeA. Blue spots in circles indicate β-Gal-positive cells (A). Scale bar, 20 μm.
Figure 9
Figure 9
RT-PCR products of c-fos (bottom panel) and β-actin (top panels) after LCM of β-Gal-positive single cells. Brain sections (8 μm) from a LiCl-treated transgenic mouse were fixed with 70% ethanol and then stained in X-Gal reaction buffer for 16 h at 37°C. β-Gal-positive single cells were microdissected in the cortex, hippocampus and CeA. The total RNA extract from each LCM sample of single cells (15–20 single cells for β-actin and 30–40 single cells for c-Fos) was used in each RT-PCR reaction. The amplified c-fos (bottom panel) and β-actin (top panels) bands confirmed mRNA expression of c-fos and β-actin genes in LiCl-induced β-Gal-positive cells in the CeA, cortex and hippocampus of the transgenic mice. CeA, central amygdala; Hippo, hippocampus.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Basheer R, Sherin JE, Saper CB, Morgan JI, McCarley RW, Shiromani PJ. Effects of sleep on wake-induced c-fos expression. J Neurosci. 1997;17:9746–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhattacherjee V, Mukhopadhyay P, Singh S, Roberts E, Hackmiller R, Greene R, Pisano M. Laser capture microdissection of fluorescently labeled embryonic cranial neural crest cells. Genesis. 2004;39:58–64. - PubMed
    1. Bonner RF, Emmert-Buck M, Cole K, Pohida T, Chuaqui R, Goldstein S, Liotta LA. Laser capture microdissection: molecular analysis of tissue. Science. 1997;278:1481–1483. - PubMed
    1. Bravo R, Neuberg M, Burckhardt J, Almendral J, Wallich R, Müller R. Involvement of common and cell type-specific pathways in c-fos gene control: stable induction of cAMP in macrophages. Cell. 1987;48:251–60. - PubMed
    1. Chiu R, Boyle WJ, Meek J, Smeal T, Hunter T, Karin M. The c-Fos protein interacts with c-Jun/AP-1 to stimulate transcription of AP-1 responsive genes. Cell. 1988;54:541–2. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms