Poor mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells-definitions, incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome of autologous transplantation
- PMID: 19925876
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.11.012
Poor mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells-definitions, incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome of autologous transplantation
Abstract
As more efficient agents for stem cell mobilization are being developed, there is an urgent need to define which patient population might benefit from these novel drugs. For a precise and prospective definition of "poor mobilization" (PM), we have analyzed the efficiency of mobilization in patients intended to receive autologous transplantation at our center in the past 6 years. Between January 2003, and December 2008, 840 patients with the following diagnoses were scheduled to undergo leukapheresis: multiple myeloma (MM, n = 602) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL, n= 238). Most patients mobilized readily: close to 85% of the patients had a level of 20/microL to >500/microL of CD34(+) cells at the peak of stimulation. Of the 840 patients, 129 (15.3%) were considered to be PMs, defined as patients who had a peak concentration of <20/microL of CD34(+) cells upon stimulation with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) subsequent to induction chemotherapy appropriate for the respective disease. Among them, 38 (4.5%) patients had CD34(+) levels between 11 and 19/microL at maximum stimulation, defined as "borderline" PM, 49 (5.8%) patients had CD34(+) levels between 6 and 10/microL, defined as "relative" PM, and 42 patients (5%) with levels of <5/microL, defined as "absolute" PM. There was no difference in the incidence of PM between patients with MM versus those with NHL. Sex, age, body weight (b.w.) and previous irradiation therapy did not make any significant difference. Only the total number of cycles of previous chemotherapy (P = .0034), and previous treatment with melphalan (Mel; P = .0078) had a significant impact on the ability to mobilize. For the good mobilizers, the median time to recovery of the white blood cells (WBCs) to 1.0/nL or more was 13 days with a range of 7 to 22 days, whereas for the PM group it was 14 days with a range of 8 to 37 days. This difference was statistically not significant. The median time to recovery of the platelets counts to an unmaintained level of >20/nL was 11 days with a range of 6 to 17 days for the good mobilizers, whereas for the PM it was 11 days with a range of 7 to 32 days. Again, this difference was not significant. The majority of the patients today intended for autologous transplantations were able to mobilize readily. As long as > or =2.0 x 10(6) of CD34(+) cells/kg b.w. have been collected, PM was not associated with inferior engraftment.
Copyright (c) 2010 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Factors affecting mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoma.Clin Cancer Res. 1998 Feb;4(2):311-6. Clin Cancer Res. 1998. PMID: 9516916 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004 Jun;10(6):395-404. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.02.001. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004. PMID: 15148493 Clinical Trial.
-
Peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection efficacy is not an independent prognostic factor for autologous stem cell transplantation.Transfusion. 2007 Dec;47(12):2207-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01448.x. Epub 2007 Aug 21. Transfusion. 2007. PMID: 17714420
-
Current status of stem cell mobilization.Br J Haematol. 2010 Sep;150(6):647-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08313.x. Br J Haematol. 2010. PMID: 20636438 Review.
-
Poor mobilizer: a retrospective study on proven and predicted incidence according to GITMO criteria.Transfus Apher Sci. 2012 Oct;47(2):217-21. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jul 10. Transfus Apher Sci. 2012. PMID: 22784631 Review.
Cited by
-
Stem cell collection after lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone plus elotuzumab or isatuximab in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a single centre experience from the GMMG-HD6 and -HD7 trials.BMC Cancer. 2023 Nov 21;23(1):1132. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11507-9. BMC Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37990162 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Proposed definition of 'poor mobilizer' in lymphoma and multiple myeloma: an analytic hierarchy process by ad hoc working group Gruppo ItalianoTrapianto di Midollo Osseo.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Mar;47(3):342-51. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.82. Epub 2011 May 30. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012. PMID: 21625224 Free PMC article.
-
Plerixafor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a German analysis of time, effort and costs.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jan;54(1):123-129. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0228-z. Epub 2018 May 24. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019. PMID: 29795422 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Counts of the Leukapheresis Product Determined Using Sysmex XN Analyzers Predict a Sufficient Number of CD34+ Stem Cells in a Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Harvest for Autologous Transplantation.Intern Med. 2024 Jan 15;63(2):189-195. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1697-23. Epub 2023 May 24. Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 37225486 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing Stem Cells Mobilization Strategies to Ameliorate Patient Outcomes: A Review of Guide- lines and Recommendations.Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2017 Jan 1;11(1):78-88. Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2017. PMID: 28286619 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous