Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers
- PMID: 19926006
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.001
Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate remote pacemaker interrogation for the earlier diagnosis of clinically actionable events compared with traditional transtelephonic monitoring and routine in-person evaluation.
Background: Pacemaker patient follow-up procedures have evolved from evaluating devices with little programmability and diagnostic information solely in person to transtelephonic rhythm strip recordings that allow monitoring of basic device function. More recently developed remote monitoring technology leverages expanded device capabilities, augmenting traditional transtelephonic monitoring to evaluate patients via full device interrogation.
Methods: The time to first diagnosis of a clinically actionable event was compared in patients who were followed by remote interrogation (Remote) and those who were followed per standard of care with office visits augmented by transtelephonic monitoring (Control). Patients were randomized 2:1. Remote arm patients transmitted pacemaker information at 3-month intervals. Control arm patients with a single-chamber pacemaker transmitted at 2-month intervals. Control arm patients with dual-chamber devices transmitted at 2-month intervals with an office visit at 6 months. All patients were seen in office at 12 months.
Results: The mean time to first diagnosis of clinically actionable events was earlier in the Remote arm (5.7 months) than in the Control arm (7.7 months). Three (2%) of the 190 events in the Control arm and 446 (66%) of 676 events in the Remote arm were identified remotely.
Conclusions: The strategic use of remote pacemaker interrogation follow-up detects actionable events that are potentially important more quickly and more frequently than transtelephonic rhythm strip recordings. The use of transtelephonic rhythm strips for pacemaker follow-up is of little value except for battery status determinations. (PREFER [Pacemaker Remote Follow-up Evaluation and Review]; NCT00294645).
Comment in
-
Transtelephonic versus remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: is one approach to be preferred?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 24;54(22):2020-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.019. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19926007 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Potential role of remote monitoring for scheduled and unscheduled evaluations of patients with an implantable defibrillator.Europace. 2008 Mar;10(3):351-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun010. Epub 2008 Feb 1. Europace. 2008. PMID: 18245771
-
Rationale and design of a prospective study of the efficacy of a remote monitoring system used in implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) study.Am Heart J. 2007 Dec;154(6):1029-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.051. Epub 2007 Sep 27. Am Heart J. 2007. PMID: 18035071 Clinical Trial.
-
Remote, wireless, ambulatory monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems: analysis of a worldwide database.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Jan;30 Suppl 1:S2-S12. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00595.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17302706
-
A meta-analysis of remote monitoring of heart failure patients.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Oct 27;54(18):1683-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.017. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19850208 Review.
-
Remote patient management using implantable devices.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011 Jun;31(1):81-90. doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9548-2. Epub 2011 Feb 17. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011. PMID: 21328042 Review.
Cited by
-
Early performance of a miniaturized leadless cardiac pacemaker: the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study.Eur Heart J. 2015 Oct 1;36(37):2510-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv214. Epub 2015 Jun 4. Eur Heart J. 2015. PMID: 26045305 Free PMC article.
-
Remote Management of Pacemaker Patients With Biennial In-Clinic Evaluation: Continuous Home Monitoring in the Japanese At-Home Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 May;13(5):e007734. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007734. Epub 2020 Apr 28. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020. PMID: 32342703 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Telemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit?Eur Heart J. 2013 Jul;34(25):1885-95. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs388. Epub 2012 Dec 4. Eur Heart J. 2013. PMID: 23211231 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical utility of remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Jun;66(4):961-969. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01406-7. Epub 2022 Nov 3. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023. PMID: 36327060 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility and efficacy of a remote real-time wireless ECG monitoring and stimulation system for management of ventricular arrhythmia in rabbits with myocardial infarction.Exp Ther Med. 2014 Jul;8(1):201-206. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1693. Epub 2014 Apr 25. Exp Ther Med. 2014. PMID: 24944622 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical