Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov-Dec;29(6):647-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Nov 19.

Prevalent and incident use of androgen deprivation therapy among men with prostate cancer in the United States

Affiliations

Prevalent and incident use of androgen deprivation therapy among men with prostate cancer in the United States

Scott M Gilbert et al. Urol Oncol. 2011 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer increased substantially through the 1990s, but more recent national trends regarding incident and prevalent use have been incompletely characterized.

Methods: Linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data were used to study patterns of ADT utilization. Prevalence of ADT in the male Medicare population was estimated by examining a cohort of prostate cancer patients and a 5% noncancer control population, from 1991 to 2005. ADT use across different indications was examined for men with incident cancers from 2000 to 2002. Nested logit models were used to examine determinants of ADT use in men with lower risk prostate cancer not treated definitively by surgery or radiation.

Results: Prevalent ADT use increased through the 1990s, peaked in 2000 at 3.17% of all male Medicare beneficiaries, subsequently stabilized, then dropped in 2005 to 2.92%. Between 2000 and 2002, use in incident prostate cancer was stable, with 44.8% use in all cases, 15% of cases as an adjuvant with radiation, and 14% as a primary therapy. In the nested logit model, predictors of ADT use in a lower risk setting were older age, higher stage and grade, and elevated prostate-specific antigen levels.

Conclusions: Following a period of rapid expansion during the 1990s, incident and prevalent use of ADT has leveled, and may be starting to decline. Further research is needed to monitor how reductions in reimbursement for GnRH agonists will affect appropriate use of ADT as well as use in settings where its benefits may be marginal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of androgen deprivation therapy among male Medicare beneficiaries between 1991 and 2005
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportions of definitive treatment (radiation or surgery) and use of ADT in patients not managed with active treatment among men with lower-risk prostate cancer over time

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Huggins C, Hodges R. Studies on prostate cancer: 1. The effects of castration, or estrogen and androgen injection on serum phosphates in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Res. 1941;1:293–297.
    1. Medical Research Council Prostate Working Party Investigators Group. Immediate versus deferred treatment for advanced prostate cancer: initial results of the Medical Research Council trial. Br J Urol. 1997;79:235–246. - PubMed
    1. Pilepich MV, Caplan R, Byhardt RW, et al. Phase III trial of androgen suppression using goserelin in unfavorable-prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy: report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 85-31. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:1013–1021. - PubMed
    1. Bolla M, Gonzalez D, Warde P, et al. Omproved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:295–300. - PubMed
    1. Messing EM, Manola J, Yao J, et al. Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:472–479. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances